Merck is supplying Keytruda (very high cost) which makes a huge difference n the burn rate.
Also, DVAX will keep 100% rights on SD-101 ... which is HUGE if the results are significant.
They announced they are planning two separate studies with Merck... SD-101 in combination with PD-1 inhibitor, Keytruda, and another in combination withMerck's anti- IL-10 immunomodulator MK-1966. Both were set to begin in the last half of '15.
There are currently two other studies underway at Stanford and another sponsored by Dynavax. There are currently 5 SD-101 clinical trials in various stages of planning or execution.
"post only the history of DVAX"
Give the board a break !
All you post is your trading bs !
Stop with the baloney !
Jim - YOU are way more tolerant and level headed than I. I let my nature get the best of me most of the time. My Defense mechanism is counter-attack when confronted. Yes this is a fault but it is who I am. Thanks for being more the "voice of reason". Guess it is not in my nature and it's part of what makes the world go round. Here doing DD. Checking in periodically
I agree Heather--I want to the BS to stop too.
I know that I push back and in doing so I help keep it going.
I do not like this but I dislike WRONG post too.
What I question is--Why does it even start?
Some on here bring nothing but the "attacking".
Zero info comes from them--I mean ZERO.
Vette, Jack and a few others have nothing useful but at the same time they have been here FOREVER and these are the bashers--the very first to start every time.
If you do the same with my post and replies--"impartially trace" I do the same as you.
I defend what I see and my post.
I post only the history of DVAX and what I see in that that history.
I do not make up lies or give false info.
My info may not come to full-light but I can back-up every post.
I will be the first say that news or world events will "twist" the charts.
These "events" will speed up at times TA or slow it down.
This is why TA works with news not against it--They work together.
I get very tired when only "part" on a previous post is re-posted and then called WRONG.
What is wrong is the misrepresentation--IMO.
Jack is great at only posting "part" of a reply or post from me.
He will delete many of his own post which are wrong when I have questioned them.
He goes out of his way to ATTACK me and the TA info.
WHY does he do this over and over?
This is the question I have.
I will say again--some on here are wrong at the "right" time--all the time.
I find this interesting and these are the ones who attack the TA side.
I can see--NOW--why DT calls them "pros" who are paid to attack.
Traders have one thing which most do not have--TA & the understanding of it.
They have the trading programs.
ALL here can get the news and the traders have this too.
I think many want to keep the retail guy "away" from TA.
The BIG traders do not want this info to be "out" because it will take away their advantage. This is my opinion and why I post what I see.
I know I see many for the big boyz moves coming--NOT ALL but many.
dvaxtruth a plus personality, Which you then have to say, I’m sorry.
timhall is a friend.
That’s all I have to say.
Your stuff has been great and I apprecaite the work you do and informing all of us. Can I ask your thoughts on how much the success of Hepislav has been priced in and how much future runups may depend on SD101? I have 4 stocks and none of them are marginable so i am trying to exercise my capital in the most intelligent way possible. I have 3000 shares of DVAX. I did listen to some of your trading posts and liquidated some at the high and diversified my portfolio with nymx, idra, and avxl which is my favorite.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
If you don't know the "back story" then showing up and telling Jim and I to "get a room" is pretty darn presumptive. ----- Once you've been around enough to understand the "back story" then maybe your opinion on it may carry some weight. Until then I'd rather you just say Thank you and be on your way.
Tim - I'm not using the word "Crew" derogatorily. I am pointing out that there IN FACT is a "Crew" and they do exist on this an most every other MB. Especially in small bio it seems. I call it for what it is.
As for Heather being a Physician ----- HOW MANY Physicians do you think post on a small bio Yahoo message board that are not a part of a Hedge Fund. Sure RA Cap is, if I remember, headed by a Physician, then they will. But practicing physicians?
I do push back too---Just like you have when you were defending.
I know what I see and I have worked hard for years to see it.
Much like you have worked for years to see the science side; I know the work docs put in.
I saw weaker highs for weeks and KNEW what traders would do with them.
I will admit that I was seeing more work at the 100 day---It need to work there.
But they (the traders) do not ask me and I got only a spike.
Instead, DVAX bounced off the 100 day and worked at the 50% retrace number which DT said.
High of the run---31.10/ Low of the run 20.07----Difference is 11.03 and divided by 2 is 5.515.
Add this to the low and you have---25.585. Look where DVAX worked for two days--within pennies.
This was not an accident and had ZERO to do with the "science" or the overall market.
It has to do with the levels of support and the traders "playing" what they saw.
You posted on another thread that DVAX was "up huge" or some words close to this.
I do not see it as "up"---but rather "back". It is not even at the highs and it is still WEAK TA wise.
NOT all highs are the same---The high on 7/14 was a "good" high because it was higher and stronger than the one before---STRONG trend was at work. However. all the other highs were higher in price but were getting weaker each time; this is not good for a trend to continue.
This is not my opinion but a fact.
"Strongbuy" wants to call this Ouija board reading---fine---Call it whatever one wants.
But I ask this question---What else does one think that the trading programs run on?
Everyone here has heard of trading programs and they have to run on something.
You are a CFO heather---You must have some computers in your business.
I know that at your level you know these computers run on a program and those program uses data that your employees must input.
Same thing with traders--They have their programs and their data.
But here is the "good" thing: Their data can be had by all---It's the history of DVAX.
I was just thinking the same thing. But asking for the back and forth that is ruining the board for the rest of us to be toned down was reasonable. And I got attacked for it, not questioned reasonably. I appreciate the trading numbers. That has been great. But the who is right argument is beyond ridiculous. If you impartially trace the thread you will find that I simply defended the pumper and name calling and attacking of my position. Thanks for the thoughtful reply and I agree that all these biotechs are speculative. I apologize if my request came off as too much. Not my intention.
I find it interesting that you have done and are STILL doing the very thing you are complaining about in the post. You first make a good statement about the bantering but do so in an "attacking way" and when you were questioned you "defended" by saying you were a CFO, a physician and in charge of the BOD--You pushed back.
You have told people to "get and room" and you would pay for it (not in a very nice way--the reason I said "attacking way"). This was not required to make your point--IMO.
Then you went into detail how all the bantering was "bad"--like children.
Yet, you engaged in the bantering to defend---the exact thing you are against in your post.
"Keep replying and proving me correct" is what you just said to DT--I am saying the same to you.
You ask the question--"Can we try to post things that matter to investors?"
Here is something that should be very important to all "investors"--IMO.
DVAX is a highly speculative stock which is losing money but it has a great story.
There are near zero if not zero "value investors" here--well over 95% of the ones here are "speculative investors". Many of these "speculative investors" are some form of trader--be it day or swing.
This is why DVAX has a high short interest--"investors" do NOT short.
A high beta which stays over 2 is done by traders not "investors" because the high beta means trading of shares--"Investors" as a rule hold for more than days.
The amount of "long only investors" are truly very few.
DVAX has some big boys buying and hold for now but let DVAX show the first signs of trouble and they will jump ship in a heartbeat--see the past for a great example.
The reason TA works here and in other very highly traded stocks is it is all based on the past and all traders and all their programs see the same data. It just depends who "pushes" the hardest--the day or the swing guys.
I never thought "pro bashers" existed but they just might.
Many here are ALWAYS wrong and are at the "right" time.