Also the stock is down a buck, if your post was correct it would be at 30 and down 50.00 idiot
what estimate our you looking at 10.89???? The estimate according to 15 analysts is
Feb 2015 4.25
Feb 2016 4.75
. Sands - CEO/COO/ Owner/s for Constellation Brands
4. Ron Fondiller - Corporate Lawyer , Secretary, Paul Zieff ESQ, Jacob Weisberg ESQ
5. Jon Moramarco (former Ceo Canandaigua Wine Co Inc CWCI, Brent Hanston Accounting Director CWCI , Mike Williamson Finance Director CWCI, Kathy Bello HR Director CWCI, Darlene Penn/Borelli, HR CWCI
David Trainer, president of New Constructs says Constellation Brands has been using acquisitions to "disguise poor underlying economics." He tells Chuck Jaffe stock in the adult beverage maker is likely to drop to $50 per share with an earnings miss as the likely catalyst that wakes up Wall Street to the issues in the company's financials.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
coco1960z • Jun 1, 2014 11:42 AM Flag
Moldauer v Constellation Brands - High Court of Australia 2013
Moldauer v Constellation Brands - Supreme Court of South Australia - Appeal - Chief Justice(2013) (Noted: Police brutality prior to court hearing) - claimed Constellation Brands does no business in Australia
Moldauer v Constellation Brands - Supreme Court of South Australia - Master Judge (2012) （Forum Non Conveniens）
CANANDAIGUA WINE CO v. MOLDAUER ( Dec 2002 - withdrawn in 2009)
Sarbanes Oxley Claim AJL - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE - DEPT OF LABOR - Moldauer v. Canandaigua Wine AJL 2003-SOX- 00026 (Nov 2003)
Arbitration - AAA - American Arbitration Association
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. ET AL v. MOLDAUER (Jan 2005)Western District Court of New York - Rochester - 05-CV-6010T
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. v. MOLDAUER (Feb 2005) State Supreme Court, Rochester New York 04-34393 Second Circuit 05-0726-cv (April 2005) - stay of Arbitration ( by a state judge in a federal matter)
MOLDAUER v CONSTELLATION BRANDS INC + OTHER (Oct 2005) (10 August 2007)
Sarbanes Oxley Claim ARB - ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD - DEPT OF LABOR - Moldauer v Canandaigua Wine ARB 04-022 (Dec 2005)
SARBANES - OXLEY - CLAIM - 2002/  - ; SOX 2008 -0073 REFERS: 836 Million accounting error traced back to 2002
AJL /DOL second response, Conclusion (29 Dec 2008)*ARB APPEAL (2009)
Moldauer v Weisberg - California USA, 2010
Moldauer v. Constellation Brands Inc + " Other ?" (NYSE:STZ ASX:CBR)- (lack of Jurisdiction - clerical error)
1. Appeal - High Court of New Zealand -- CIV : 2007- 404-5589
2. Appeal in High Court
3. Court of Appeals in New Zealand - Wellington July 2009
CIV-2005 – 004 – 001686 Auckland District Court, New Zealand (2005)
（Statement of claims (breach of contract, breach of code, deceit, fraud) (2005): - claimed Constellation Brands has no business in New Zealand Less
*Constellation Brands Q2 Net Income $0.19 Bln Vs. $1.52 Bln Last Year 2014-10-02 07:41:32 STZ Other
*Constellation Brands Expects FY15 Comparable EPS Of $4.10-$4.25 2014-10-02 07:43:34 STZ Other
went from 10.89 EPS to 4.10. more than 50% loss of eps and net icome over over 80%
Sentiment: Strong Sell
edddy_98 • Dec 5, 2002 1:19 AM Flag
0 users liked this posts users disliked this posts 0
cooking the books???
I hear that their west coast operation is cooking the books according to a former analyst that was fired after questioning certain practices.
Sentiment: Strong Sell
Maybe, hard to say, one clown Stifler makes it 113, the other 50, the funds have vested interests in the paper gains, even if unreal,, but one thing is sure STZ rolled the books for the better part of the past two decades. How they got away with it is beyond the average John Doe.
wrong....GAAP is 4.25 and no company would be a strong sell at 8 times EPS
US diplomat David Keegan said: “Some of our co-operative operations – such as monitoring radicalizing Kiwi jihadists – strengthen her country’s security”, but Clark: “Has also been willing to address targets of marginal benefit to New Zealand that could do her political harm if made public”.
That contradicts statements in New Zealand intelligence agency annual reports that their operations relate purely to national security. According to the cables, US and New Zealand officials doubted there was public support for the closer ties and preferred to keep them secret.
A February 25, 2008, cable said New Zealand foreign affairs officials had responded positively to a US proposal for increased “defence engagement” but “emphasized that it is committed to avoiding publicity”.
The US cable commented: “Clearly NZ domestic political sensitivities could make it increasingly difficult to consider any high-profile bilateral activities.”
Market Perform and $88 price target?
Yahoo has a $98 price target. EPS of 9.83 and PE of 8.87.
I think it will outperform the market and go to 98.
Anybody else have any opinions. Which brewery has the most upside?
Sentiment: Strong Buy