KB - My question was not well posed...We know that 1 year OS for 300 cells was 96% and 100 cells was 79% but no add'l data on OS between to the two cohorts after year 1??? Just wondering why that data is not being shared...
Thanks - this is interesting background data.
But my point was, and still is, - there was an immediate 5% increase in the share price the Monday after the Barron's article, and - unlike most "Barron's effect" price changes - this one persisted for, now, two weeks, and grew to almost 7%.. I read somewhere - probably on this message board - that the premium to NAV was now about 7%. What a coincidence!
My point was, and is, this looks like a good source of about 7% return (annual), but the recent price jump of 7% represents a year's return, so I plan to wait till the price settles back to about 20.5, where it was before the Barron's Round Table article.
So, they are going to boost to 750 phones for the qtr? Lol.
Nice analysis, but you could have said it in a much more brief and to the point way.
Example. In my opinion, I AM DOGPOOP'S are going to suck.
I have copied all the messages in which I was impersonated....l do not know how to find out how Tony/Jim was able to do that. So if you want them let me know.
Well y'all can rest assured I ain't neva gonna be stayin' at that hellahole ya'll call an Inn there Mista. Innkeeper... What's your badge number anyways?