Simply read Cawleys pleading filed Friday and the answer to all "3 questions" are contained therein. Although the Judge knows this he has been taking a "crash course" on technology, has to read and comprehend volumes of documents and exhibits that have been filed, research the cited cases, and handle a case call of probably 200 other cases. He must be overwhelmen at this point and I personally do not expect, and do not want, a Markman ruling until he is fully iinformed. I expext this will take many more weeks. Nevertheless, I think this is a positive for the longs so we get rulings that fit those 3 FACTS the shorts dread and spin their spam that "Dr. F taught them; the technology is bogus", those 3 facts prove otherwise. By the way, some time ago I posted that this case was David v. Goliath; is Forbes guilty of plagarism? (just kidding). WE WILL PREVAIL.