% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Linn Co, LLC Message Board

  • sollid_companiess_only sollid_companiess_only Jun 18, 2013 2:42 PM Flag

    Cooperman's Omega Advisors Is 'Comfortable' With Linn Enegy

    Cooperman's Omega Advisors Is 'Comfortable' With Linn Enegy

    BY Antoine Gara | 06/18/13 - 02:23 PM EDT

    Updated from 11:45 a.m. ET to clarify of Linn Energy's hedging activities and include afternoon share prices.

    NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Leon Cooperman of hedge fund Omega Advisors is comfortable with his investment in Linn Energy (LINE_), amid analysis from major media and independent research firms that the oil and gas driller may be unable to support a high-yielding dividend and is only worth 50% of its current share price.

    "Omega Advisors, Inc. is comfortable with our investment in Linn Energy, we are convinced of the professionalism and integrity of the company's management, we are optimistic about the company's future growth and financial performance," Cooperman wrote in a June 17 letter addressing Omega's investment in Linn Energy.

    In his letter, Cooperman pointed out that Linn Energy has mostly hedged its energy production with costless swaps contracts, potentially undermining claims that the company is under-reporting costs incurred to hedge its energy risk. Such costs, Barron's argued, could mean Linn Energy is unable to maintain its dividend payout.

    Omega Advisors is Linn Energy's largest outside investor, with a 3.05% holding in the company's shares worth more than $200 million, according to March 31 Securities and Exchange Commission filings compiled by Bloomberg.

    Continued in the reply to this post:

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Continuation of original post:

      Cooperman argued Linn Energy has capitalized the costs of its energy hedges in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (GAAP). Non-GAAP metrics such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) that are often cited by Linn Energy and investors, by definition, would not include the capital expense of put contracts, Cooperman's letter stated.

      Finally, Cooperman highlighted that independent third parties Citigroup and Credit Suisse have valued LinnCo (LNCO_), a subsidiary Linn Energy is using to acquire Berry Petroleum, at $35.92 a share and $39.64 a share. Those valuations are well above Linn Energy's current share prices and, according to Cooperman, take into account any tax liability the company would face in its proposed acquisition.

      "[We] are of the view that the shares are undervalued and offer an attractive total return proposition -- dividend plus change in capital," Cooperman wrote in a follow up e-mail to TheStreet.

      Currently, Linn Energy is a battleground stock in an energy sector filled with activist investor dramas, CEO change and corporate breakups.

      At issue is whether Linn Energy can maintain or even expand its high-yielding quarterly dividend payout of 72 cents a share and whether a potential drop in the dividend would chip at the company's valuation.

      Barron's and independent research firm Hedgeye Risk Management both argued that Linn Energy isn't properly expensing its costs to put on energy price hedges, which have so far helped the company either maintain or grow its dividend for 29 consecutive quarters.

      Continued with a reply to this post:

0.1197-0.0029(-2.37%)May 23 4:00 PMEDT