Best to consider any SA article a blog. Most will be crappy. A precious few may be expert. Pick some of the shady characters who've been posting here over the last week, and they are likely SA authors.
One thing a SA article isnt, is news. They must pay Yahoo a fee on click throughs and that is why Yahoo lists the link. That is my guess.
Um... the guy is a complete idiot. Look at his previous article on CHTP: http://seekingalpha.com/article/424241-how-to-play-chelsea-therapeutics
- he made another bunch of BS claims, heartily recommending people to buy straddles, and claiming is was bullet-proof. Naturally, all the people who followed his advise lost big time plane and simple, since for straddles to work CHTP had to go either below $2 or above $5. Yet, he doesn't hesitate to even reference this paper and even claim that it was all good, since straddle buyers didn't loose as much as people who bought calls [what a f$%king genius..]. That's just hilarious.
He is a rather brash fellow also "That said, you would be wise to also read what I have to say about the company, because I have a successful stock picking track record on Wall Street covering emerging growth ideas and small cap plays like this and of all sorts.
if he was so great he wouldnt be writing b.s articles for a wannabe stock publication. he would be a manager of at least a billion dollar fund! anyone can see he has motives...why not tell the whole story? pipeline?
This article basically says, Head I win, Tail you lose. Doesn't all the analysts review does the say. They were providing "BUY" rating till last week when the price was $4 and now when the price is $2.6, they are giving it a "HOLD" rating. What choice do I have?