% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.


  • fighterpilot fighterpilot Jan 6, 2013 3:02 PM Flag

    The right order


    First disarm the criminals and mentally sick and then lets talk about the guns of law abiding citizen.

    I have no problem with this approach, but taking guns out of the hands of law abiding citizen while providing no effective protection, and declaring that we are unable to take the guns away from criminals because they do not respect the law.


    This topic is deleted.
    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Pillsbury Doughboy, when have you ever used a gun to protect yourself or others? For me it's been never, and I've been around a few years now. If they eliminate all guns it wouldn't bother me the least bit, but I know you cowboys think it's your divine right to own guns, so lets just elimate all assault weapons to begin with, and require the registration of all hand guns, and hunting rifles, and those that break these laws will be given a stiff sentence, especially if they've a weapon to commit a crime.

      • 1 Reply to keep_investing
      • Keep, the second amendment is also intended not to just allow us to protect ourselves from criminals but also to protect ourselves from the government if it ever turned tyrannical. If that ever happened assault weapons would be necessary. So, you can do all the name calling you want, but I don't have any problem cowgirling up! I am not a whoos and I'm not scared.

    • You are right,, taking my guns would make me vulnerable to criminals with guns,, I would consider mine and my families lives to be in danger,, are politicians to gadam stupid to see this,, but yet many of them have armed gaurds,, unbelievable,,

      Sentiment: Hold