....when the stock starts going down. It's like all the giddiness and joy has been sucked right out of this board, when in truth we should be used to the volatility, because it happens all the time, and will only stop after there's efficacy.
I remember back in 2010 when it ran up from .04s to peak at .11 and then pulled back to dip below .08 and all the nay-sayers sell, you're trapped, doom doom doom, blah blah blah, and then it ran up to .27
The safety trial is going better than expected and many other irons are in the fire. I said .05 before .50 and it hit .05 so it's time to climb. Nothing goes straight up, but if ya had listened to me (again, I am eataspacecake) and I have an impeccable record of calling ACTC stock movements since I gave a strong buy in 2010 in the .04s and posted my reasons for selling in the .20s (Bad Omen Thread) and several bounce plays and of course .05 before .50 and my recent mid/end of this January run prediction.
This was just a warm-up, the big run is coming soon.
Yeah, that was me. Yapoo defaults me to cake mokey for some reason and I am too lazy to change it... (Yes, I do have 2 aliases, and have told the story of cake_monkey before, funny but I am too lazy to repeat it... who was that tarp fisherman again? Thar she blows!)
Is that what you were actually typing? Or did it get garbled and you hit post before noticing? Not a slam, a strange phenomenon has been occurring lately. Sometimes the garbling is so far removed from something I had typed I am thinking about keeping a camera focused on my keyboard to see if I really typed what appears.
Of course that is different from the intentional mis-spellings that one might have to do to post things which provide insight and logic, but are contrary to prescribed paradigm of thought. Of course that gets tiring. So wapoo, and others, reduce discourse to regurgitation and parroting of the the vacuous talking points fed through all form of media and entertainment.
So sad, so much to say to encourage the 'thinkers' to actually start thinking, but can't do it on discussion forums.
Don't you think improving vision and attachment show efficacy? Not being tested for that, but it is pretty apparent, no?
And, the excitement was more about what was being reported than claims of "to da moon", imo. Now, it's wait and wait some more, again.
Minn, we need more than two patients subjectively claiming to have improved vision from 18 months back, we need actual medical proof, and we need more than two. And the showing of engraftment is good news, but it's not efficacy, for efficacy is the only thing that will take this stock "to da moon".
Minn, to da moon is an old joke that got started years ago, just like we close at a 1$,, its all in fun,,
The platelet program is the big ticket this year and we will find out soon enough,,