Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. maintains this website as a service to investors and others interested in our business. We use reasonable efforts to include accurate and up–to–date information on this website, but we disclaim any and all warranties and representations, express or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of the information presented herein. We are under no obligation to update any information contained herein. We are not responsible for any action you take in reliance on the information presented on this website, and you agree that your access and use of the website and any and all contents presented herein is at your own risk. Neither Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. nor any party involved in creating, producing or delivering this website shall be liable for any damages, including but not limited to any direct, incidental, consequential, indirect, or punitive damages, or lost profits, arising out of your access of or reliance on, or use or inability to use the website, or any errors or omissions in the content of the website.
Except for the historical information contained herein, all statements in this website constitute forward–looking statements. All forward–looking statements, including but not limited to statements regarding product development, collaborative efforts, receipt of regulatory approvals, obtaining of proprietary protection such as patents, and commercial acceptance and future applications of our technology, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward–looking statements. Additional information on potential factors that could affect our results is included in our Annual Reports on Form 10–K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10–Q. We disclaim any obligation to update our forward–looking statements.
Kry, that sounds like something that a sham company might use to cover their butts, but all companies probably use the same jargon. And I am sure Gary sleeps better at night knowing he'll not be held accountable for his actions, or lack of actions..
Of course they are obligated to insert a disclaimer. Something can go awry. Same is true for any other company. So I'm not surprised to see one here. However, the disclaimer doesn't protect them from litigation for promoting outright misleading information. Which makes Gary's statement at the end of the video very curious.
Not really. They are validating paradigm shifting medicine. And everything he says is subject to the disclaimer, like with ANY corporate presentation that would be given by any company in any field, and many have said similar things, not about companies involved in medical history. Besides, it appears that you're assuming he means something different than what that statement actually says.
If this is the first you've seen of this or it surprises you in any way, whatsoever, it seems EXTREMELY unlikely you were the CFO of a public company, ever, except in your dreams. I'm referring to your quoted text by bearclawe below… someone appears to be a big fibber.
You are misconstruing the sequence of events on the board and why I posted the quote in the first place.
Someone had posted the GR quote as if it stood as a statement outside the "forward looking statement" exception and I posted the LEGAL blurb in to show that the website did indeed try to cover the GR statement.
So BIO---skippy boy-----it did not surprise me--- I was just trying to be helpful. Now why don't you just butt out #$%$.
Re: Here is the clarifying disclosure....................................
You just figured that out, Ms Sophisticated Investor ?
"I know this as a sophisticated investor...."
krycap64 • Aug 12, 2013 2:27 PM
Fighters mommie---- I know this as a sophisticated investor, GR could have told us anything yesterday regarding ACTC including top secret plans as LONG AS HE DOES IT AT THE SAME TIME TO A PUBLIC FORUM and he chose not to mention his little financing scheme yesterday in that PUBLIC FORUM TO GIVE EVERYONE EQUAL NOTICE IN THE DILUTION. Unless the rules have changed he could of gave all shareholders notice in any public forum or mass communication with shareholders. My opinion only. DO your DD on your own.
"I' ve served in Board and executive capacity....."
krycap64 • Jul 19, 2013 2:11 PM
wrong---I've been here a long time and I'm not Keep. The only thing Keep and I share is that I do believe we can do better than GR as I've served in Board and executive capacity and I do not like what I see but I'll hold my fire until I see more facts.
" I've been a CFO of a public reporting company......."
krycap64 krycap64 • Jul 21, 2013 12:52 PM
Dear Westley I've been a CFO of a public reporting company and clearly know what can and cannot be said.
krycap64 • Sep 17, 2013 11:15 AM
Voted 1.492 mil as "NO" to GR, "NO" to Dilution and "Yes" to split