You could check his Twitter account if you're curious. If you're asking because of the pathetic SA "article" and want him to respond, I would hope he doesn't. Responding to something like that gives the impression, to some people at least, that it possibly poses a threat. And there isn't a threat.
Anyone can write for SA, no credentials of any sort required. Any moron with a keyboard and spell check can write for SA, and in case it was the article that concerned you, there is no reason Lanza or anyone else at ACT should feel compelled to respond to some little nobody.
Apparently, the site owners don't even verify the identity of the authors. The Street just ran an article (the link is available on their home page) that showed two recent pro-GALE articles were authored by one person at a stock promo company as part of a paid promotion conducted for Galena, and were published on SA under different names.