Because we have faith in the management of ACTC to do what's in the best interest of their shareholders and the company. If it wasn't for the shrewd business decisions of management where would we be? While it may seem like we are on our way to .05 pps you have to give these guys a chance.
The issue is IP assigned to ACTC. Nothing would have to be assigned to ACTC when there is no agreement. Lanza can keep IP to himself and use as AG bargaining power for settlement.
Note the new patent. Wow amazing isn't it! Well that could be kept outside ACTC if management is playingn there cards right. This applies pressure to AG and anyone else. Why would Lanza sink good IP in a company with so many issues unresolved.
The FFFING attorney in Oceanside needs to settle or the judge should make him settle as he is ruining a company with litigation that is unreasonable.
I would imagine all decisions right now are being made based on the the April 29th arb. A/G stands to make a lot of money by settling and threatening to detonate the company would certainly help push them to settle. Doesn't do much for us though. One can only hope that both parties find the arb recommendation reasonable and we move on.
Actually I was worried about Dr Lanza not signing back when Gary was still CEO, but now that he's gone I am less woried about it. I believe that curing AMD & SMD is Dr Lanza's life long dream, and he's not about to run out on it now, so I am not concerned about him leaving ACT.