Sun, Feb 1, 2015, 3:22 PM EST - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Ultratech, Inc. Message Board

  • donni_l donni_l May 30, 2006 2:14 PM Flag

    Brinker Sell Signal??

    Markets are tanking again.

    Did Bob miss a sell signal again?

    When will this madness cease?

    http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?c=$WLSH,uu[w,a]dacayiay[dd][pb50!b200!
    f][vc60][iLp14,3,3!Lo22]&pref=G

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • 52 = Steve

      ROFLMAO

      I sure hope you are better at identifying sharks.

    • "I'm baffled as to why Dija is doing the same damn thing with Queen posting as all of these silly Brinker syncophants."

      I'm baffled as to why you think the situations are even remotely comparable.

      When has Queen ever showed near total recall of everything Mark ever wrote going back years? When has she ever claimed to know what beverages he drinks? Where has Queen showed any knowledge of what Mark was going to be doing next weekend, or who he was going to be playing golf with?

      Another crucial difference: you do know that "Don" never denied it, don't you?

    • "
      There is ZERO chance that he is queen. Only a moron would believe that, or someone who is blinded by his own propaganda campaign"

      What an idiot. Even Math said you were clueless.

      "I'll even go further: I am 100% sure that don lane was Bob brinker. I mean, who the heck else had near total recall of everything Brinker has ever said on the air, and knew what his favorite beverages were? I am baffled as to why dija is going so far out on a limb to dispute this,"

      I'm baffled as to why Dija is doing the same damn thing with Queen posting as all of these silly Brinker syncophants. Then claiming she probably didn't know that Fish was posting all of those expletive perjoratives. I do recall that sHE feigned indignation when others less kind to the guy you have called a miscreant and an scoundrel (only taking the former back) used less harsh "barn talk" .

      You are either the dumbest bloak in the world or just play the role to help Brinker. I am inclinded to believe the former.

    • In fact, I would say that I am 99+ percent sure that he is not Queen. And I know that Queen is smart enough to accept that as good enough.

    • math said to newslettercheat:

      <<I don't agree that he's Queen. I have no idea whether he's Mark. I do think that he's "homely_lie_lackey.">>

      --I agree.

      There is ZERO chance that he is queen. Only a moron would believe that, or someone who is blinded by his own propaganda campaign.

    • fish said:

      "Looks like you Brinker hating bashers have been caught with egg on your faces AGAIN....."

      --Exactly!! There's a very good reason why newslettercheat and his admirers go back 6 years or more for their criticisms! -:)

    • basher said:

      <<I agree that something doesn't add up. I was not defending Kirk. I was only stating the facts as I know them. The only people I am aware of who were kicked off of 101 by Kirk are Steve Reich, Paul Joslin and Mark Johnsen. If you are aware of more please list their names.

      You always said if Kirk wanted you to leave you would. Well Kirk finally had enough of your BS and took you up on your offer. Please explain why you said I was spinning. As I stated I was just relating the FACTS as I knew them.>>

      --Among the reasons I KNOW you're spinning are:

      a) You said kirk "finally had enough of my bs." Anyone who was at 101 in those days knows you are skewing reality.

      b) You said kirk "took you up on your offer," which anyone knows is putting a big spin on the truth.

      He asked me to leave because I was exposing the bashers' spin, and he lied about the reason. He said it was because I played a "word game" with him, as if that was a cardinal sin. Even you must know that was not the real reason.


      basher said;

      <<George W Bush has done things that help me and my family. People have every right to criticize him and I have every right to tell those people to go straight to HELL. The democrats and the media unfairly attack president Bush. My vendetta against them goes back the Lyndon Johnson in the 1960's. I hate them far more than I dislike Bob Brinker.>>

      --Are you conducting internet message board vendettas against everyone who has criticized Bush, or just brinker? -:)

      <<I see my vendetta, as you call it, as no different than your vendetta against Kirk. You genuinely dislike the man and attack him daily. I feel the same way about Brinker.>>

      --You would have a very, very hard time finding the last 2 posts in which I criticized kirk. He's a hypocrite and one of the worst human beings I have ever known, but I hardly ever think about him. 99% of my posts here have to do with things other than kirk. Yet, 99% of YOUR posts consist of brinker-bashing.

      You STILL haven't answered 3 or 4 of my questions.

      So far, I definitely have to agree with fish. You're not levelling with us about the real reasons for your vendetta.

    • "You wouldn't agree with anything I am on record as saying."

      We agree that QQQQ and TEFQX were bad calls, and we agree that they have been covered up. We agree that the Brinkers' discussion boards were badly run.

      "Indeed today you would not agree that Bob Brinker posted as Don Lane."

      But I do agree with that.

      "You would not agree that Junior pup posted as himself giving his own phone number and adpad address in a newsrelease he was so proud of."

      For a perfectionist like you, I guess 99+ percent sure is just not good enough!

      "When pressed how in the hell that could be you come up with this crap when admitting you had not a single logical explanation."

      OK, now we're finally getting to something we disagree about. I did come up with a logical explanation. I said he could be a clever imposter. (Note that you did not ask for a *likely* explanation!)

      "I'll even go further: I am 100% sure that don lane was Bob brinker. I mean, who the heck else had near total recall of everything Brinker has ever said on the air, and knew what his favorite beverages were? I am baffled as to why dija is going so far out on a limb to dispute this.."

      I was wrong to say 100% sure. I'm older and wiser now, and I know that things can *seem* certain and still turn out to be wrong. (Why it sticks in your craw so much that I went from 100% sure to 99+% sure is something the world will never understand.)

      "Alas you let the cat out of the bag in 2002 and it is obvious to anyone who is not trying to be dishonest that Brinker made those posts."

      Obvious is not the same thing as certain. Sometimes obvious things turn out to be wrong.

      "t's equally obvious that Queen was dong the beejive silliness along with the officernasty, markiamnot et all silliness. Same guy posted as Butter here all day long and same guy posted as Mark at 101."

      You're certainly entitled to your opinion.

      "Sorry that your love for Brinker and you distaste for me causes you to skew reality."

      Hmmm...this, coming from the guy whose Marketimer reads differently from everyone else's?

      BTW, I think I love you and Brinker about the same amount. And I've noticed that neither one of you takes my advice!

    • "I don't agree that he's Queen."

      Of course not. You wouldn't agree with anything I am on record as saying. Indeed today you would not agree that Bob Brinker posted as Don Lane. You would not agree that Junior pup posted as himself giving his own phone number and adpad address in a newsrelease he was so proud of. You wouldn't admit that Jr. was posting as himself while he was talking to Justa, who you know full well knew Jr. and Sr. because he posted his own thread on thier site--and MAKING CHANGES ON BOB BRINKER.COM. When pressed how in the hell that could be you come up with this crap when admitting you had not a single logical explanation.

      "Bear in mind, though, that it is not necessary to actually come up with an alternative explanation in order to justify refusing to say that there couldn't be one. "--Math Junkie--2006"

      Of course in a more candid moment, years closer to the time you and Brinker and Junior were posting with one another on that site you said this to Dija:

      "I'll even go further: I am 100% sure that don lane was Bob brinker. I mean, who the heck else had near total recall of everything Brinker has ever said on the air, and knew what his favorite beverages were? I am baffled as to why dija is going so far out on a limb to dispute this.."

      It's a lead pipe cinch that you were more likely accurate or telling the truth 4 years ago than now. You were only a couple years away from the hay day of sucking up to Brinker on SI and watching in awe as he played you goobers like a fiddle. You have admitted when called upon your fawning over Brinker that you were "overly optimistic" where he was concerned.

      Alas you let the cat out of the bag in 2002 and it is obvious to anyone who is not trying to be dishonest that Brinker made those posts.

      It's equally obvious that Queen was dong the beejive silliness along with the officernasty, markiamnot et all silliness. Same guy posted as Butter here all day long and same guy posted as Mark at 101.

      Sorry that your love for Brinker and you distaste for me causes you to skew reality.

    • I don't agree that he's Queen. I have no idea whether he's Mark. I do think that he's "homely_lie_lackey." All of this is just my opinion, of course.

    • View More Messages
 
UTEK
15.94-0.51(-3.10%)Jan 30 4:00 PMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.