Will somebody direct me to the notes from queen, Dija, and Math complaining about the language used by a shill over the last few days?
I know they must have complained the same way that they complain about Basher and others here.
LITTLE PISSANT BRINKER STALKING PRICK
you LITTLE PISSANT PRICK BASTARD
Interesting that the LITTLE PISSANT PRICK BASTARD basher 5-2 doesn't stalk them obsessively. No, I think Basher (that LITTLE PISSANT PRICK BASTARD)
what a PISSANT LITTLE PRICK DUFUS
dija said to shocked: "--Have you ever stopped to think that maybe queen hasn't read the recent posts closely enough to remember that it was fish who used the quotes you provided?"
I read his posts dija, and I understood who posted them. But the ONLY question shocked asked in his ORIGINAL post on the subject, 125054, to which I was responding, was:
"Will SOMEBODY direct me to the notes from queen, Dija, and Math complaining about the language used by a shill over the last few days?" [emphasis added] There is NO other question.
I translated that to a little needle jab meant to say "WHY isn't anybody complaining about the bad language like they did when basher and jojo used bad language?" If he didn't mean that, do you suppose he is really claiming there WERE such posts from dija, queen and math? I don't think so.
There were no such posts from dija, math or queen and he knows it. There was only ONE question in the original post, 125054, and I answered it to the best of my ability. He doesn't have to like it. End of story.
Dija said to shocked: "Why did you beat around the bush?--"
Bingo. Therein lies the rub.
Thanks for the post.
>>Transparent aren't you?
Apparently not to you.
>>It's in your dreams that Kirk is your buddy and would actually talk to you like you were a friend.
That would be his only chance...in real life I avoid people who act like him.
Of a lap dog?? Hardly. HTH
"Math sheepishly answered!"
So now it's "sheepish" to answer a question? No wonder you don't like to do it!
"I think that is more power than Honey has and certainly points out the hyporcisy in this post from a few months ago of yours."
If you look at the post I was replying to, you will see that "That says much about who you are" was merely reflecting Duplicity_detector's words back to him.
Is that the best you can do?
>>What he wants or doesn't want is immaterial to my decision.
Ya....riiiight. You and Pinocchio have a lot in common from the expanding nose to the strings....make her dance a little bit... will ya Kirk?HTH
You're being a little silly about this whole thing.
All I said was, if you want people to understand your questions, you should ask them in a clear manner. Don't beat around the bush.
If you want comments on fish posts, say it.
But if you want to keep asking questions so that some people miss your point, you are certainly free to do so.
newslettercheat said to math:
<<Therefore you are posting at a site "where you can control what people say. That says a lot about you.">>
--It doesn't say anything about him, unless he actually DOES it. In fact, if he can do it, and doesn't, it says only good things about him.
<<Additonally Honey as I recall does not give links to conversations on other sites.>>
--As *I* recall, she said she doesn't post links because kirk won't let her.
"The person pretending to be a queen needs yours and junkie's help. That person is arrogant, rude, devious, and pretends to be pretty stupid"
Not to mention gender confused. sHE stumbled over claiming to have a "husband" . Has to be difficult for a guy trapped inside a female shill role.
"Why didn't you ask queen, me and math what we thought about fish's posts?"
"My question has to do with why you chose to leave fish's name out of your questions, when it was fish you were referring to."
Why indeed. Has anyone here told you how to word your posts? Can you direct me to the Yahoo section that has these journalistic rules?
It was an open note addressed to noone. sHe chose to answer, and then proceeded to try to cover her mistake with her typical multiparagraph mumbo jumbo.
You have turned this discussion to how I word notes? Simply amazing! You shills are something else. You are wasting my time with these silly word games. I see why it irritated others.
The person pretending to be a queen needs yours and junkie's help. That person is arrogant, rude, devious, and pretends to be pretty stupid.
I wonder if that reminds you of anyone in particular?
If you don't approve of the way I word my notes, feel free to leave here whenever you want. HTH LOL
I asked Math while he was pompously differentiating his "informational content" from Honey's "spam" :
"Just to be clear. Are you cabable of denying access to posting on your site? Is it a "moderated" site?
Math sheepishly answered!
"Yes, it is a moderated board. I can remove posts from public view.."
Thank you, I figured as much.
You go on to talk about some site administrator who could overule your decisions after you have deleted a post on your MODERATED BY YOU thread. Obviously YOU can remove posts just like at Justa's site on SI. Therefore you are posting at a site "where you can control what people say. That says a lot about you".
I think that is more power than Honey has and certainly points out the hyporcisy in this post from a few months ago of yours.
"Re: Brinker Behive Chickens
by: math_junkie2003 02/20/06 03:03 pm
Msg: 116024 of 125138
I see you prefer a site where you can control what people say. That says much about who you are.
Additonally Honey as I recall does not give links to conversations on other sites. I recall you and the Brinkers used to link Brinker's site on SI but others including Lane and Pipsqueek Brinker, the site manger for Bob Brinker Dot Com would complain when 101 was linked. There is no better SPAM than links to the site you desperately want people to visit. Your entire premise has blown up in smoke. I suggest you rename your site "Hypocrites R Us". You and your 'me too' boy Dija can perhaps go there and wallow in the mire of "Our spam is different" hubris only the two of you and Queen multialias Brinker shill are buying. .
Well, you made me go and read the Moderator's Handbook!
Yes, it is a moderated board. I can remove posts from public view, and if I do, then I have to mark it with one of six possible reasons. iHub's manager then reviews the deletion, and if he disagrees, he will restore the post.
Because the thread is in the "Free Zone," if I want to deny someone posting privileges on the thread, I have to ask iHub's manager to do it.