Nah, too old or I might just do that. I disagree with you but I respect your opinion. At least you have one which is getting a little hard to find these days (well, not on THIS board)...I'm going over to Motorola board and see what they're talking about...out.
Yeah it's a shame Clinton didn't get him. How's George doing with that hunt? Last time I heard they disbanded the CIA group that was searching for him. And Bush knew about bin Laden prior to 9-11 also.
And what does Iraq have to do with 9-11 anyway?
Nah, there are others out there who support old GW. He's certainly not perfect - but who among us is - and Iraq is clearly eating his lunch, but can you imagine our world today if Gore was President on September 11, 2001? He would have crawled into his lockbox (private jet) and left the rest of to fend for ourselves against an entire culture of people who play by rules that we'll never understand. No thanks, I'll support a man of conviction because he has no easy answers and hasn't for his entire length of service, he's not committing adultery in the friggin' White House (or at least it's not public) and then lying about it, and he has a backbone - a rarity in politics and even rarer in Democrats.
Although I don't agree with much of his policy - and I'm a Texan - I do respect that he's been dealt some s*** in his presidency but he is at least making a stand. Us Texans are like that (I know he's an Ivy-League'er).
Don't get complacent because it's been 5 years since 9/11 - the bad guys are out there and they're working around the clock figuring out ways to kill Americans by the thousands, not 2.5 years designing a $600 toy.