Selling 100 million units in five years at average cost of $200 & profit of $100 on 50% margins, spread over 900 million shares, equals gain in annual EPS of $2.22. Probably conservative.
What a crock of xxxx ...Remember, they said the same thing about the I-Phone just before the launch. In fact, they said the same thing about every product Apple ever made. Including the I-Mac, the OVER-PRICED I-Mac that no one would ever buy. Now what is it? A watch? You can be guaranteed one thing about Apple products no one will ever buy anything Apple makes ever again. That watch will run you a bit more then $200. Look for 300 to 500, maybe more. I just don't get how you figure 200 million times $300 each in profit would improve Apple's bottom line? You can't buy even a cheap watch for $200....Where did you come up with that price?
The watch is loosely based on the Nano with some added circuits so it can act as a wireless adjunct to your iPhone or iPhone. It will NOT cost more than $200 unless it is significantly more than that, and I don't think it will be. Think of it as a wireless remote with a programmable screen to allow it to access your iPhone without ever having to remove it from your pocket.
Forbes reached similar conclusions with a more detailed analysis about a month ago:
If these assumptions are correct, and they are most likely aggressive, then the iWatch could add $0.43 to $1.55 EPS in the first year, $1.25 to $3.78 EPS in the second year.
(These are approximations, of course, because more accurate estimates would depend upon which quarter it would be introduced, etc. By looking at four quarters, the intent is to smooth out those effects to get a rough approximation for this analysis.)
Today, earnings estimates for Apple for FY 2014 are $43.70 and earnings estimates for FY 2015 are $46.45. Clearly, an iWatch launch, even with aggressive assumptions, will not have the earnings impact that the iPhone or iPad had for Apple. Apple earned $3.17 total for the four quarters before the iPhone launch, and earned $5.11 total for the four quarters after the iPhone launch, an increase of 62% (EPS calculated on former accounting practices, shown for illustrative purposes that EPS improved after launch). Apple earned $11.78 total for the four quarters before the iPad launch, and earned $25.26 total for the four quarters after the iPad launch, an increase of 114%.
However, the launch of an iWatch could still have meaningful impact on Apple’s stock price even with a smaller impact on earnings. How? The launch of a new product category for Apple would meaningfully impact Apple’s P/E multiple.
First, the overwhelming reason cited for Apple’s stock demise from over $700 to today’s mid $400 levels is the changed perception of Apple from a growth stock to a value stock. Investors lamented the lack of innovation and catalysts for growth in Apple’s future. An iWatch introduction would change the perception of Apple and the multiple investors would assign to it.
Second, Apple’s current Price/Earnings multiple on a trailing twelve month (TTM) basis is 10.6x. When Apple introduced the iPad in April 2010, Apple’s Price/Earnings TTM multiple was 20.2x. By WWDC in 2010, Apple’s Price/Earnings TTM multiple expanded to 23x, more than double today’s multiple. By the end of 2010, Apple’s price/earnings TTM multiple settled to 21x. When Apple introduced the iPhone in January 2007, Apple’s price/earnings TTM multiple was 33.4x and rose to 38.5x at the end of June when the iPhone was released. By the end of 2007, the multiple increased to 50x. Product launches in the past have enabled Apple to earn much higher Price Earnings multiples than they have today. (Historical P/E multiples source: YCharts)
Third, if Apple were to introduce the iWatch in the beginning of FY2014, a $700 stock price target would equate to a Price/Earnings TTM multiple of 15.5x to 15.9x, based upon a iPad or iPhone adoption curve, respectively. For FY 2015, a $700 stock price target would equate to a Price/Earnings TTM multiple of 13.9x to 14.6x, based upon an iPad or iPhone adoption curve, respectively. For Apple to trade at these multiples is not out of the ordinary. Apple traded in these ranges as recently as in the fourth calendar quarter of 2012, and higher historically.
Creating a new product category is essential for Apple to break out of its current trading pattern. The market generally has lost its confidence in Apple to innovate and has punished Apple by leaving it in the Value Stock bucket. A new product category would change investors’ mindsets and give Apple a Price Earnings multiple more deserving of a growth company. In this manner, the incremental earnings that a new product category, like the iWatch, could generate would help propel the stock back to previous levels.
Bashing a product that apple hasn't even announced... And estimating how much it will sell a d what effet it will have ..... Proves one thing... U bashing idiots have run out of things to bs about......
But it is ok. As long it keeps u entertained... Keep i up...
You are only making yourselves look stupid !
LMAO @ those estimates.
100 million iWatches sold? Haha.. There are not enough iNerds who are going to buy that many watches. I cannot believe people some people are brainwashed enough to actually think iWatch will be a be a massive hit.
Did you buy the Nintendo Powerglove back in the day? I bet you invested in mobile pagers back in 1997 as well. Those were supposed to be hits as well... Too bad they both had the same practicality as an iWatch.
Sentiment: Strong Sell
"I bet you invested in mobile pagers back in 1997 as well. Those were supposed to be hits as well... Too bad they both had the same practicality as an iWatch. " fact OVER 61,000,000 pagers were in use in 1994 (you don't need to use your toes - just your fingers) that's THREE years BEFORE 1997.