% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

USG Corporation Message Board

  • Mr_WarpSpeed Mr_WarpSpeed Feb 7, 2003 9:27 AM Flag

    Reason for yesterday's drop

    It seems clear to me that yesterday's drop was caused by this remark from William Foote:

    "USG Corp. Chief Executive William Foote flew to Washington to warn Illinois Senator Richard Durbin that the Chicago-based wallboard maker would 'disappear' without curbs on asbestos lawsuits."

    That's a pretty strong statement to be making, although I wonder if he was over stating his case simply to get Durbin's attention. It's hard to imiage that a company that just made a profit of $21,000,000 in the latest quarter ($.49/share) is going to dry up and blow away if asbestos legislation doesn't pass soon. We've all seen the analysis from BGIG, et al that calculate residual value. But Foote is the CEO and his statements are taken seriously and then put through the market meat grinder. Although the bipartisan support for passing legislation is quite positive, the flip side is that no clear, singular or agreed approach has surfaced yet. It could take a year or more to sort out the various takes on what to pass.

    The link to this article has been posted a few times it is again:

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Here's a more chilling thought.

      Maybe Wolin will throw USG back out of Bankruptcy court because he feels they are solvent. In effect, rather than setting a bar date and challenging claims - he will argue that they can do this in the legal system and not in bankruptcy court.

      The result would be an onslaught of new claims that have been stayed up to this point.

      Perhaps that's why Foote is worried.


      • 4 Replies to wabuffo
      • First as I recall insolvency is not a legal pre-requisite for BK filing. I recall some perfectly solvent corporations did that to get out of labor contracts that the unions forced on them. Secondly that may not necessarily be such a bad outcome - the company will regain
        freedom of maneuver and could use techniques
        well known to Asset Protection lawyers. They
        know how to set up paper fortresses around assets with the use of limited partnerships and asset protection trusts(usually offshore).
        Sometimes they simply encumber assets with
        liens/mortgages held by offshore entities.
        They have ways to avoid fraudelent transfer issues. Also all of this can be done even after
        the liability has already been incurred. Lastly
        USG always has the option of going on the offensive against the asbestos lawyers by filing RICO lawsuit(s) against them

      • wabuffo,

        I think your scenario is unlikely. The Judge won't know whether USG is solvent or not until the estimation process is completed.

        I bought more today at $5.72.

        Looking forward to see $4. Cheers!

      • "Perhaps that's why Foote is worried"

        Foote made his remark in March 2001...Things have quite changed since then...

      • I didn't want to mention that for fear of starting a riot here, but you may be right.

    • It is not unlikely that USG would disappear if asbestos lawsuits kept coming at them. 3 billion dollars is a lot of money. But divided by the cases and award given to the claimers, it is not inconceivable that this fund will be exhausted at some point. Unless USG can preserve enough cash at a rate exceeding the claims, time will wear out USG equity.

25.56+0.64(+2.57%)12:39 PMEDT