Wed, Sep 17, 2014, 6:29 AM EDT - U.S. Markets open in 3 hrs 1 mins


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Silver Wheaton Corp. Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • hapiwondrer hapiwondrer Nov 16, 2011 3:49 AM Flag

    VERY OT. We were in a store today

    “When in history have people ever had as many children as they can afford? ...”

    It depends how you look at it. During times when there were great hardships because of living standards, and access to good healthcare, people had more children to compensate for the mortality rate.

    That is different than people having children because they know they can avail themselves of various (Marxist) government social programs, which in many reported cases places their family income far above what it would be if they had to pay for the support themselves. That would seem to be the opposite of “overpopulation (is) humanity hating Marxist nonsense”. This actually encourages larger family size by those receiving transfer payments from people who work, pay taxes, fend for themselves and live within their means. All things being equal, the latter group is not going to grow their family beyond affordable levels.

    Large families are particularly noticeable in many low income Hispanic populations, who are more likely to receive support payments in many forms from the government (state and federal). Have you ever heard the term “anchor baby”?

23.06+0.23(+1.01%)Sep 16 4:02 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.