% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Clearwire Corporation (CLWRD) Message Board

  • yesmistermorningstarr yesmistermorningstarr Feb 8, 2013 4:28 AM Flag

    Clearwire spectrum is the one for the future and what Son is after

    Clearwire spectrum is the one for the future and what Son is after;


    In busy urban areas, it is capacity rather than range that’s required. In some countries, we are already seeing macro cells deployed very densely: in London every 400 to 500 meters, in China every 200 meters, and in Japan even closer. In this situation, we don’t recommend using lower frequencies (e.g. 700 or 850 MHz) because of the greater interference issues. Instead, we’d expect both 3G and LTE to use higher frequencies, such as 1800 MHz, 2.1 GHz, 2.3 GHz and 2.6 GHz.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Your reference points out that a range of spectrum is needed. Generalized statements about what operators need are fine but they ill describe the timing or priorities of individual operators.

      Q1: What spectrum bands are easier to achieve coverage?
      Q2: What spectrum bands are more suitable to achieving high density capacity?

      A1: Lower frequency bands
      A2: Higher frequency bands.

      What does the bulk of the market want?,
      A1: Widest coverage? or
      A2: Highest bandwidth capacity?
      A3: Both in fair measure?

      What spectrum best fulfills the majority of consumer demands?,
      A1: The low frequency bands because they can be deployed quickly with OK bandwidth
      A2: The higher bands - although it costs more to achieve coverage, its best longer term.
      A3: A combination of low, mid, and high frequency bands because they compliment each other.

      Waddaya think?

    • Its not about competing in wireless. Its about competing for the broadband access and taking on all comers whether it be wireless, cable, dsl, satellite etc...Mr. Son is a visionary, a mover and shaker, and a disruptor. He is not only looking at the typical consumers wireless smartphone bill of $70-$100. He is thining of that $70-$100, the $50 DSL bill, the $150 cable/internet bill etc....If he can provide and offering that allows one to go to a single device/pipe then he is well ahead of the game.

      Sentiment: Strong Buy