The longer shorts claim BK for Affy and it does not happen the more of an aesss it make them look like, a strong short squeeze is just what they need and it is about to happen.
Hi Bill, you should posting #$%$ to pump the stock. There are no set timelines for reporting the investigation outcome. Stop posting the garbage. I do expect that too come soon, but there is no obligation on the part of AFFY/ Takeda to provide the status update.
Even if there is anything, they will update to FDA confidentially stating that still in progress.
Though I'm very positive on AFFY, you should stop posting some unsubstantiated information. There is no difference btw Gayhorns and US!
Sentiment: Strong Buy
jagoff! Regardless of your limited reasoning skills, it is very simple that even a 5th. Grader can understand it, so I will restate it....If Takeda/Affy has "Material Information" regarding Omontys and they do not release it to Shareholders/Public, in a timely manner then they are in violation of the SEC . LOL?....what do you think is the basis for existing Lawsuits against Affy???? Answer..WITH HOLDING INFORMATION FROM SHAREHOLDERS!!!! Also them updating the FDA goes without saying D.A.!! I am concerned with Affy Shareholders being left in the dark for an extended period of time when the results have most likely been in for weeks!! If you want to see a pumper I suggest you look in the mirror in between your College Classes! Lololol
Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) is a new issuer disclosure rule that addresses selective disclosure. The regulation provides that when an issuer, or person acting on its behalf, discloses material nonpublic information to certain enumerated persons (in general, securities market professionals and holders of the issuer's securities who may well trade on the basis of the information), it must make public disclosure of that information. The timing of the required public disclosure depends on whether the selective disclosure was intentional or non-intentional; for an intentional selective disclosure, the issuer must make public disclosure simultaneously; for a non-intentional disclosure, the issuer must make public disclosure promptly. Under the regulation, the required public disclosure may be made by filing or furnishing a Form 8-K, or by another method or combination of methods that is reasonably designed to effect broad, non-exclusionary distribution of the information to the public. (AFFY/TAKEDA MUST MAKE THE UNKNOWN KNOWN)
I fail to see your logic, it comes off as wishful thinking. Yes, if there is a disclosure, it must be made public, but what's the link with the SEC requiring an update on the O investigation? There's no reason that anything must be disclosed right now.