"The problem with your observation is that O was administered to replace E and not the other way around."
And what replaced o when o was pulled? Being the world famous lawyer you claim to be, well, lawyer, retired, anyway, which drug would you hazard a guess to be the proximate cause, the drug administered in the time leading up to death, and administered 3 times weekly, or the one whose administration was stopped well before?
I see logic is blinding you to the between the lines truth as seen through the secret glasses of our 30 year author of misleading letters. Don't expect a logically reply. Good response sir.