If any fellow long has time and ability to deal with the ridiculous Omontys page on wiki please do. It looks like the work of the serpent cult. Wiki is often one of the top sites to begin research and its current reference to a study for an indication for which it was not approved. Ask if wiki supports these references designed to damage the reputation of the product.
Hey t0m, i'd volunteer for it myself if i knew enough to do it. Not how to do it but the knowledge of the product, i've already done some editing on wiki. I notice lately they've changed a bit, have to sign up to be allowed to edit. I've already done that, awhile ago. I don't know enough of the pharmacology and total background of the product to even think of volunteering for it, and there are other longs here i don't know would be qualified enough as well to do it justice. I will nominate someone who clams he does know enough. No, not you, though you're certainly qualified. I think there's someone else, someone who owes omontys a real good effort. Maxdad. Be well.
Its still the same. GeedoubleU's work I believe. No one else has reference the PEARL like GeedoubleUPee, the most experienced master misleading posts here even to the point of pumping to hit his shorting target in Aug.