ki1gore, deepvalue, dividendar, marcuz, netcircle, runkookrun, mghaynes,....
why are they hanging out here since they claim RAS is such a bad company? They ignore the basic facts that RAS has 2 consecutive positive quarters and is now trading at 0.23 of its book value. they claim to be here to help newbies from being fooled, and keep posting negatives on RAS. They are just shorts, liars, paid bashers, or sore losers who have lost money on RAS in the past.
Feel free to add to the list
In last 24 hours you posted under at least 3 IDs: davisfoulger, mediadavis, and longsign.
The unfathomable volume goes beyond just the davisfoulger posts, which makes you 'Extra Sick'.
Get help. Really. You don't know everything about everything, including mental disease self-diagnosis. Seek help.
Like the morons running this country, you can shout down or "ignore" the truth, but at the end of the day, it is still the truth.
And....thanks for bumping this back to the top of the message list. It highlights what people think (star count) and they don't seem to think much of you and your fear of an opposing point of view.
Wait a second, it was the morons who ran this country from 2001-2008 who were busy shouting down the truth with fake mobs and ignoring the truth even when it was given to them on a platter by the FBI and CIA, and attempting to create the truth by telling those same folks from the FBI and CIA that they already knew the truth and needed them to package it right for them.
I do know this, if you are as bright about stocks as you are about politics, its no wonder you can't recognize a 5x opportunity when you trip over it.
pheight shouldn't be regarded as a basher. He questions the stock, but he also pays attention to what other people say and is willing to acknowlege that longs have made a case which is at least reasonably well thought through. He doesn't agree with it, but my read is that he's a reluctant critic.
Now why would anyone ignore you, im? You are willing to engage in real discussion without posting nonsense.
Lots of people engage in technologically assisted selective attention. When people give themselves a reputation for posting silliness, why not put them on ignore.
I don't, of course. I had enough of ignoring folks back in Fall, 2007. Better to know what the zero research contingent is saying.