you are viewing a single comment's thread.view the rest of the posts
Why did DAM took Chinese to the International Court? Was it part of MF master's plan or they did NOT expect DAM taking Chinese to the court and WHY??? if that was the case???
You do NOT make another deals with some who robs you in the first place unless that was just ...
Who were on the other end of MF line, OFFSHORE and in the States?
Why DAM and Joll, and Eero, three ON2 and Hantro CEO, forced to resign and how much, if any, they knew about MF secure line and contacts on the other end of the line? Why these three CEO were not, possibly, informed of all MF contacts and secure lines related to ON2 "business"?
Why Joll could not cash his shares at $0.90 or was he able to sell them off before forced-resign?
1) Vimicro [China]
2) ON2 & China Netcom
3) ON2 & China Nanwang Multimedia Technology
4) ON2 & CTTNet [China]
5) Hantro(ON2) & Spreadtrum [China]
6) ON2 & Tencent [China]
7) ON2 & Tudou.com [China]
8) ON2 & 56.com [China]
9) ON2 and CCTV.com [China]
10) ON2 & 21Vianet [China]
11) ON2 & NetEase [China]
12) ON2 & Shanghai InfoTM [China]
Remember, the ( ON2's ) tight lipped management replaced the resident accountant with a forensic accounting expert. Why ? to cover their deceptive tracks ?
No wonder that so much of ON2's products have been re-named or are not recorded anywhere anymore.THat includes revenues hidden to camouflage the real rising value and tremendous potential of ON2
Remember that the masterplan was to decimate the pps to a point where all this crap could fly low under the radar and therefore the SEC could dismiss it as just another failed penny stock. Sofar their crime has been under the radar, they succeeded.
The keyword here is "SOFAR "
Had we lost honestly in the investment business we would go on to other things. However, how this was done, on thee sly for over a year, giving misinformation to shareholders during C.Calls, mislead the whole shareholder base. Then a day before the first ever profitable quarter forced us to accept the sale to Google by sewing up the pps, no competitive offers allowed etc. We had a chance to vote, yes, but the results were withheld and manipulated ( Dec.23 )
and the criteria for the next vote became ignorantly fiction. That's how we all lost out on the billions that ON2 will bring to Google's through Oxide Inc.
Why did ON2 HIDE under the shadow of an Israeli company instead of ANNOUNCING to the World the EXISTANCE of ON2 Hantro+VP8 Chipset long before Google "completing" the FRAUDULENT "merger" in Feb 2010? Why using OFFSHORE company INSTEAD of the one FROM US of A?
Re: Why did ON2 call its Chipset G1 instead of Hantro...? 20-Apr-10 09:59 pm
How many of them are ALREADY in trouble by "HIDING" On2 related products or delaying them in Google's and MF demands?
How many ON2's customers/Partners were/ARE INVOLVED in this Illegal using of ON2 chipset called ON2's "G1"? How could we track ON2 product prior to Feb 2010 after this NAMING FRAUD?
Re: Why did MF present ON2 "G1" under SHADOW of Israeli Company in Barcelona in Feb 2010? 19-Apr-10 09:38 pm
First someone needs to look into it. Why did ON2 call its Hantro+vp8 Chipset as "G1" in Dec 2009 or "long" before Google FRAUDULENT "merger" being "completed in Feb 2010? And, why ON2 NOT announce Hantro Chipset with VP8 and WHY ON2 shareholders MUST have EXPPOSE where about of these products? Why under SHADOWY company name instead of its OWN ON2 name?
Anyone looking into this? Does NOT matter where the people are from. Was it LEGAL or NOT? It is as imple question.
Q3 Conference Call, November 8, 2007:
Bill Joll [ON2’s ex-CEO]: "China Mobile is continuing to progress -
we have recently seen an uptick in trials."
Chinese "Homegrown" was What DAM and Joll missed to realize but MF already knew what did it mean????
Company Puts Android on Laptop With China-backed Chips
Owen Fletcher, IDG News Service Owen Fletcher, Idg News Service – Wed Mar 3, 11:50 pm ET
A Chinese company is tweaking Google's Android operating system to run on a laptop using homegrown Chinese microprocessors, which are backed by the government.
The move by Lemote Technology, based in China's Jiangsu province, is the first sign of interest in Android among backers of China's Loongson chips, which also go by the name Godson.
The Lemote netbook, which has an 800MHz Loongson processor, also adds to the number of devices running Android on MIPS chip architecture. Loongson chips' use of the MIPS instruction set puts them apart from the x86 processors made by giants like Intel. It means the chips cannot run mainstream programs like Windows made for x86 processors. But MIPS Technologies last year said it had ported Android to the MIPS architecture and began promoting its use, largely on embedded devices such as home media players
Google: Android launch in China 'irresponsible'
Nicole McCormick | January 20, 2010
In a press statement Tuesday, Google did not explain the reasons for the delay. But a Google executive is quoted as saying it would be “irresponsible” to launch the smartphones in China, as planned, since it was unclear “how things are going to turn out” in the coming weeks.