Fri, Sep 19, 2014, 12:43 AM EDT - U.S. Markets open in 8 hrs 47 mins

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Google Inc. Message Board

  • ohio_romney_ryan ohio_romney_ryan Oct 22, 2012 3:37 PM Flag

    The Three Google Billionaires Stooges Schmidt Page & Brin are Obama Biggest Supporters for Political Faver

    Obama The Next One Term President Sees Middle Class Tax Increase as a Last Victory

    The Largest Tax Hike in US History has just been upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States and President Obama sees this assault on the middle class as a victory.

    The already unpopular 2010 health care reform law has been converted by the court into a $1.76 trillion tax increase funded by escalating taxes to be paid the vast majority of taxpayers. The high court’s ruling leaves in place 20 tax increases in the health-care law, of those, 12 tax hikes would affect families earning less than $250,000 per year, including a “Cadillac tax” on high-cost insurance plans, a tax on insurance providers, and an excise tax on medical device manufacturers. By formally converting ‘Obamacare’ into ‘Obamatax,’ the court allows Obama to raise taxes on the middle-class.

    The decision is a distressing blow to taxpayers and represents the single largest tax increase on young people in the nation’s history. When it takes full effect, the Internal Revenue Service will have immense new power and authority to persecute and prosecute a whole new group of taxpayers.

    If the law takes full effect, it will devastate small businesses and destroy any chance for a sustainable economic recovery. It will add trillions of dollars to the national debt and push the country toward bankruptcy even faster than current projections. Any individual who believes that this decision must be overturned must do everything possible to undo the damage that has been done, especially at the ballot box on November 6.

    –Obamacare law contains 20 new or higher taxes on American families and small businesses–

    WASHINGTON, DC – Obamacare contains 20 new or higher taxes on American families and small businesses. Arranged by their respective effective dates, below is the total list of all $500 billion-plus in tax hikes (over the next ten years) in Obamacare, where to find them in the bill, and how much your taxes are scheduled to go up as of today:
    Taxes that took effect in 2010:

    1. Excise Tax on Charitable Hospitals (Min$/immediate): $50,000 per hospital if they fail to meet new “community health assessment needs,” “financial assistance,” and “billing and collection” rules set by HHS. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,961-1,971

    2. Codification of the “economic substance doctrine” (Tax hike of $4.5 billion). This provision allows the IRS to disallow completely-legal tax deductions and other legal tax-minimizing plans just because the IRS deems that the action lacks “substance” and is merely intended to reduce taxes owed. Bill: Reconciliation Act; Page: 108-113

    3. “Black liquor” tax hike (Tax hike of $23.6 billion). This is a tax increase on a type of bio-fuel. Bill: Reconciliation Act; Page: 105

    4. Tax on Innovator Drug Companies ($22.2 bil/Jan 2010): $2.3 billion annual tax on the industry imposed relative to share of sales made that year. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,971-1,980

    5. Blue Cross/Blue Shield Tax Hike ($0.4 bil/Jan 2010): The special tax deduction in current law for Blue Cross/Blue Shield companies would only be allowed if 85 percent or more of premium revenues are spent on clinical services. Bill: PPACA; Page: 2,004

    6. Tax on Indoor Tanning Services ($2.7 billion/July 1, 2010): New 10 percent excise tax on Americans using indoor tanning salons. Bill: PPACA; Page: 2,397-2,399

    7. Medicine Cabinet Tax ($5 bil/Jan 2011): Americans no longer able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non- prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin). Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,957-1,959

    8. HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike ($1.4 bil/Jan 2011): Increases additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax- advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,959
    Tax that took effect in 2012

    9. Employer Reporting of Insurance on W-2 (Min$/Jan 2012): Preamble to taxing health benefits on individual tax returns. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,957
    Taxes that take effect in 2013

    10. Surtax on Investment Income ($123 billion/Jan. 2013): Creation of a new, 3.8 percent surtax on investment income earned in households making at least $250,000 ($200,000 single). This would result in the following top tax rates on investment income: Bill: Reconciliation Act; Page: 87-93
    Capital Gains Dividends Other*
    2012 15% 15% 35%
    2013+ 23.8% 43.4% 43.4%

    *Other unearned income includes (for surtax purposes) gross income from interest, annuities, royalties, net rents,
    and passive income in partnerships and Subchapter-S corporations. It does not include municipal bond interest or life insurance proceeds, since those do not add to gross income. It does not include active trade or business income, fair market value sales of ownership in pass-through entities, or distributions from retirement plans. The 3.8% surtax does not apply to non-resident aliens.

    11. Hike in Medicare Payroll Tax ($86.8 bil/Jan 2013): Current law and changes:
    First $200,000 ($250,000 Married) Employer/Employee All Remaining WagesEmployer/Employee
    Current Law 1.45%/1.45%2.9% self-employed 1.45%/1.45%2.9% self-employed
    Obamacare Tax Hike 1.45%/1.45%2.9% self-employed 1.45%/2.35%3.8% self-employed
    Bill: PPACA, Reconciliation Act; Page: 2000-2003; 87-93

    12. Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers ($20 bil/Jan 2013): Medical device manufacturers employ
    360,000 people in 6000 plants across the country. This law imposes a new 2.3% excise tax. Exempts items retailing for Mitt Romney’s surge continues.He has narrowed the gap against President Obama to a single point in the critical swing state of Ohio, with the president clinging to a one-point lead, according to a new pollThe Public Policy Polling tally shows the president topping Mitt Romney by 49-48 percent...

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Vote for Romney/Ryan

    • Many Ohio - Michigan - Florida - Pennsylvania Democrats Switching to Mitt Romney for President

      Women Review Debate 3, Governor Mitt Romney Pasted The Test, Ready to Lead USA
      By USA_Jewish_Women 10 22 2012

      Debate 3: Women's Review: President Obama Was Arrogant, Disrespectfully Angry Condescending to Governor Mitt Romney on Oct 22, 2012.

      Mitt Romney's Stunning turnaround in these past 3 debates

      Obama has lost support among Jewish women voters.

      Most Jews are Turn Against Obama across the 50 states,

      A Jewish Women Focus Group of 7,890 on October 22, 2012

      President Obama Was arrogant, angry, disrespectfully, condescending and much to aggressive, did not look very presidential at all.

      Governor Mitt Romney looked much more presidential, ready to be commander-in-chief. America he said, needs a strong economy in order to have a strong military for our National Security now and in the future.

      We came away from this debate with a very good impression of Mitt Romney, in that he would be a “ a safe pair of hands.”

      We feel he’s tough enough to do what’s necessary, but laid-back enough not to do too much and get us into another war. Romney did not attack President Obama's policies, he simply pointed out a few improvements in a respectable way.

      During the debate Governor Mitt Romney seemed more like the president and Barack Obama more like the candidate and challenger.

      Governor Mitt Romney was calm, thoughtful, relaxed, steady and looked very presidential. He looked and acted ready to take the job as commander-in-chief. Expressed his views on Iran's Nuclear threat and the USA support of Israel, our good friend and ally.

      He impressed us tonight, in that a vote for him is a vote for American security, peace and safety, a strong economy, a strong military, millions of higher paying jobs, prosperity and quiet peaceful life for us and our families.

      The world is much to scary these days; Americans aren’t looking for a scary weak president.

      Tonight we came away with the feeling that President Obama is more the scary one, in America's weaken relationship with Israel, a closer to Nuclear Iran, our weak economy and the huge 16 Trillion Dollars in Debt, that in itself Threatens our National Security.

      We can not afford four more years of president Obama's spending and borrowing another 5 or 6 trillion dollars from countries like China. Our jewish women's focus group therefore endorse Governor Mitt Romney for the next president of the United States of America.

      Obama's Re-Election is very questionable. Vote for Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan

      • 1 Reply to political_ganster
      • faith_destiny@sbcglobal.net faith_destiny Oct 24, 2012 10:35 AM Flag

        PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED CURATIVE INSTRUCTIONS
        1. Instruction Regarding The Disney-Google Agreement
        Members of the jury, yesterday you heard counsel for Defendants ask Dr. Becker a
        number of questions during cross-examination regarding a patent license agreement between
        Disney and Google. Defendants were trying to establish that the technology of the DisneyGoogle Agreement is comparable to the technology of the patents-in-suit that I/P Engine is
        asserting against Google and the other defendants. The Court has ruled that the technology of
        the Disney-Google Agreement is not comparable to the technology of the patents-in-suit. As a
        result, the Court instructed you to disregard all testimony regarding the Disney-Google
        Agreement. You may not consider that agreement, or the amount of that agreement, for any
        purpose, including trying to determine what the appropriate royalty should be in this case.
        I want to emphasize that my instruction to you on this matter is in no way a reflection that
        Dr. Becker did anything improper. During his direct examination, Dr. Becker testified that he
        was not relying on the Disney-Google agreement because there is no evidence that the Disney
        technology is relevant to any issue in this case the questions of Defense counsel regarding the
        Case 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-TEM Document 740-1 Filed 10/24/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 160891
        Disney-Google agreement were improper. The Court has therefore ruled that any evidence
        regarding the Disney technology is improper and irrelevant.
        2. Instruction Regarding Discovery of Google’s Financial Information
        You also heard counsel for Defendants ask Dr. Becker questions regarding whether he
        had asked counsel for I/P Engine for further documents or information to support his opinions
        regarding his apportionment, or whether there was a final version of PX 64, the Revenue Force
        document. After reviewing the record on this matter, the Court has found that counsel for I/P
        Engine had requested those documents and information from Google, but that Google did not
        produce to I/P Engine a final version of the Revenue Force document, PX 64, or any documents
        providing the numerical support for the slides on page 38 of that document. I instruct you that
        you may conclude, based upon the cross-examination questions asked of Dr. Becker by
        Defendants’ counsel, that Google had additional documents and information that, had they been
        produced, would have provided further support to Dr. Becker’s opinions regarding his
        apportionment.
        Sentiment: Buy
        .2 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts ReplyIgnore User | Report Abuse ..View Replies
        Re: Re: New PACER Doc - Interpretation anyone?
        By harpolerichard . 26 seconds ago . Permalink
        .OK. So the way I read this: The Judge rules that the Disney-Google technology agreement DO...

        OK. So the way I read this:
        The Judge rules that the Disney-Google technology agreement DOES NOT-IS NOT the same as the tech infringement Google is being sued for. Judge instructs Jury to disregard Becker testimony
        specific to this agreenet as it is not comparable specific to tech and settlement amount...this is nothing but a BIG POSITIVE for Vringo.

        Google was trying to 1. Say it was the same tech and 2. The damages should be similar if applicable....read between the lines...Goolgle is saying we are guilty but this is what we would like to pay.
        .0 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts ReplyIgnore User | Report Abuse ..Re: New PACER Doc - Interpretation anyone?
        By marinedelray . 7 minutes ago . Permalink
        .Yesterday the judge struck the cross examination of VRNG's expert. Striking testimony ...

        Yesterday the judge struck the cross examination of VRNG's expert. Striking testimony after it has already happened is not ideal. He really shouldn't have allowed it in the 1st place. So now the judge has to give a curative instruction, something to the effect of "you will disredard..." All still an indication that rulings went in VRNG's favor yesterday.
        .0 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts ReplyIgnore User | Report Abuse ..Re: New PACER Doc - Interpretation anyone?
        By nick.henny . 7 minutes ago . Permalink
        .basically the judge threw out this testimony...which is good for VRINGO because GOOG was t...

        basically the judge threw out this testimony...which is good for VRINGO because GOOG was trying to use this to limit the damages for their infringement.
        Sentiment: Strong Buy
        .0 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts ReplyIgnore User | Report Abuse ..Re: New PACER Doc - Interpretation anyone?
        By bbondslf25 . 1 minute 47 seconds ago . Permalink
        .This is re-confirmation of yesterdays news... becker's cross examination was striked.....

        This is re-confirmation of yesterdays news... becker's cross examination was striked... so judge is telling jury to disregard it...( curative)

    • Women Review Debate 3, Governor Mitt Romney Pasted The Test, Ready to Lead USA
      By USA_Jewish_Women 10 22 2012

      Debate 3: Women's Review: President Obama Was Arrogant, Disrespectfully Angry Condescending to Governor Mitt Romney on Oct 22, 2012.

      Mitt Romney's Stunning turnaround in these past 3 debates

      Obama has lost support among Jewish women voters.

      Most Jews are Turn Against Obama across the 50 states,

      A Jewish Women Focus Group of 7,890 on October 22, 2012

      President Obama Was arrogant, angry, disrespectfully, condescending and much to aggressive, did not look very presidential at all.

      Governor Mitt Romney looked much more presidential, ready to be commander-in-chief. America he said, needs a strong economy in order to have a strong military for our National Security now and in the future.

      We came away from this debate with a very good impression of Mitt Romney, in that he would be a “ a safe pair of hands.”

      We feel he’s tough enough to do what’s necessary, but laid-back enough not to do too much and get us into another war. Romney did not attack President Obama's policies, he simply pointed out a few improvements in a respectable way.

      During the debate Governor Mitt Romney seemed more like the president and Barack Obama more like the candidate and challenger.

      Governor Mitt Romney was calm, thoughtful, relaxed, steady and looked very presidential. He looked and acted ready to take the job as commander-in-chief. Expressed his views on Iran's Nuclear threat and the USA support of Israel, our good friend and ally.

      He impressed us tonight, in that a vote for him is a vote for American security, peace and safety, a strong economy, a strong military, millions of higher paying jobs, prosperity and quiet peaceful life for us and our families.

      The world is much to scary these days; Americans aren’t looking for a scary weak president.

      Tonight we came away with the feeling that President Obama is more the scary one, in America's weaken relationship with Israel, a closer to Nuclear Iran, our weak economy and the huge 16 Trillion Dollars in Debt, that in itself Threatens our National Security.

      We can not afford four more years of president Obama's spending and borrowing another 5 or 6 trillion dollars from countries like China. Our jewish women's focus group therefore endorse Governor Mitt Romney for the next president of the United States of America.

      Obama's Re-Election is very questionable. Vote for Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan

    • Obamafusion - Crushing Blow to USA Economy: Obamacare Will Cost US Corporations Billions

      It’s almost as if Obama and democrats actually want the economy to collapse?

      The country is just beginning to discover the massive economic damage from Obamacare.
      GOP Senators reported:

      Economic Damage Of Health Bill Continues

      AT&T, 3M, And AK Steel Already Report Devastating Effects Of Health Bill

      “AT&T Inc. Will Take A $1 Billion Non-Cash Charge In The First Quarter Because Of The Health Care Overhaul And May Cut Benefits It Offers To Current And Retired Workers.” (“AT&T Will Take $1B Non-Cash Charge For Health Care,” The Associated Press, 3/26/10)

      “The Telecommunications Company Also Said It Is Looking Into Changing The Health Care Benefits It Offers Because Of The New Law.” (“AT&T Will Take $1B Non-Cash Charge For Health Care,” The Associated Press, 3/26/10)
      “3M Company Today That It Expects To Record A One-Time Non-Cash Charge Of $85 To $90 Million After Tax… Resulting From The Recently Enacted Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act.” “3M Company said today that it expects to record a one-time non-cash charge of $85 to $90 million after tax, or approximately 12 cents per share, in the first quarter of 2010, resulting from the recently enacted Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, including modifications made in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 passed by Congress on March 25, 2010. The charge is due to a reduction in the value of the company’s deferred tax asset as a result of a change to the tax treatment of Medicare Part D reimbursements.” (“3M Anticipates New U.S. Healthcare Law to Result in One-Time Charge of $85 — $90 Million After Tax in First Quarter of 2010,” 3M, 3/26/10)

      “AK Steel Holding Corp., The Third Largest U.S. Steelmaker By Sales, Said It Will Record A Non-Cash Charge Of About $31 Million Resulting From The Health-Care Overhaul Signed Into Law By President Barack Obama.” (“AK Steel Sees $31 Million Charge From New Health Law,” Business Week, 3/23/10)

      It was also announced today that the democratic bill will cost Florida at least 700 jobs immediately.

      HotAir has more on the billions that Obamacare will cost US corporations.

      Caterpillar Inc. announced that Obamacare will cost the company $100 million in one quarter.

 
GOOG
589.27+4.50(+0.77%)Sep 18 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.
Oracle Corporation
NYSEThu, Sep 18, 2014 4:04 PM EDT
Rite Aid Corporation
NYSEThu, Sep 18, 2014 4:02 PM EDT
The Boeing Company
NYSEThu, Sep 18, 2014 4:00 PM EDT