$1,500 BIOPSYS FINISHED/ NOW HAVE +98% RATE ..................
I am not a lawer by no means and have no training in law at all however, I know that MELA is not intended for reducing biopsies, but this is where the gray area comes into play for me. The machine will not be available to every Derm when it first comes out however, when it is availabe to all Derms and they elect not to use it for some reason, could those Derms who miss the 20 to 30% of melanomas open themselves up to further legal ramnifications as legel and triple appear to be pointing out by not utilizing Melafind when it is available to them? If they have the opportunity to increase their performance with Melafind and elect not to, then it seems that they could be opening themselves up for further legal action in not utilizing it if they miss a questionable melanoma.
NOW GETTING BACK to the issue about doing no harm to patients.If a physician suspects the growth is cancerous he will then use Melafind to confirm his diagnosis to be sure he is correct.Melafind of course will confirm his decision and NO BIOPSY will be needed at that point.The physician will remove the cancerous growth and spare the the patient from the expence and pain,complications from a Biopsy.This is what I was referring to when I stated "Do No Harm" oath physician take unless the harm is justified.Melafing is not an invasive procedure and it also says the insurance companies the costs of Biopsys which is in the many Millions per year.Melafind has a stong presence in the medical feild coming very soon.
<<Captain Stupid requests information from the guy who led him into disaster.>>
You really are an hardheaded IDIOT! I have told you numerous times that I was into MELA big time before I discovered this board. Here's another NEWS FLASH for you DUMMY, I am still in the green with this, BIG TIME!