Sat, Nov 29, 2014, 5:22 AM EST - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Comcast Corporation Message Board

  • mad7411 mad7411 Sep 27, 2004 1:55 PM Flag

    Bush the Christian

    well, what a timely bipartisan article, given the nature of the posts over the last day or so:

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/manion/manion53.html

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Good Link

    • call it bullying it if you want, but without the "bullying" (bulldogging as someone else once called it) you'd have never gotten the above concessions from me.

      also refered to as "bullshit"

    • >>when i said "well, i guess i'd phrase the question another way...", that was in response to dg asking me a question. so, what i am saying back to him is "let me put your question to you in another way". in essence, i answered his question with another...<<

      ok FINE. that IS an explanation i can accept. however, can't you accept the fact that none of this would have started if, in your very first response to dg you had said:

      >>"well, i guess i'd phrase YOUR question another way...", instead of "the" question.

      thanks, finally, for full clarification. i accept your position.

      >>i have made more than a reputation for myself on this board, and others, answering questions and providing information.<<

      to which i would add: AS HAVE I.

      >>if you wish to bully someone, <<

      call it bullying it if you want, but without the "bullying" (bulldogging as someone else once called it) you'd have never gotten the above concessions from me.

    • pebs, with all due respect, i think you're misunderstanding something. when i said "well, i guess i'd phrase the question another way...", that was in response to dg asking me a question. so, what i am saying back to him is "let me put your question to you in another way". in essence, i answered his question with another...

      it's not a back off; it's a question to a question.

      you did understand that, right?

      as for your dodging and facts comments..save it pebs. i have made more than a reputation for myself on this board, and others, answering questions and providing information.
      if you wish to bully someone, your best bet would be to stick with bass.

    • if you made yourself very clear, then why aren't you being very clear in your response to my msg?

      did i mis-state anything in that msg?

      didn't i show the EXACT sequence of the msgs that were posted?

      did i mis-quote either you, dg or myself?

      show me where i was wrong in what i posted.

      >>i'm sorry that you do not understand that, follow it, or have a different take on the matter.<<

      no need for you to be sorry about any of that, becuase your problem is that i DID understand it; i DID follow it (much too closely for your comfort) and i DON'T have a different take on the matter.

      your inability to respond to the FACTS that i just posted is nothing more than a dodge on your part as to the ACTUAL events.

      i'll leave it to dg to follow up on the matter.

      discuss it with him.

    • where did i say he was speaking FOR you? all i did was comment that he shouldn't be trying to read your mind. you sure has hell didn't say a thing about apache helicopters, did you?

      sorry to confuse ya there pebb...the remark about Apache helicopters (shoulda said Black Hawk actually) making air attacks (ala Israel) on residential civilian areas in the sunni triangle was an illustration of mad's remark about the coalition causing civilian deaths...dont ya get it?

      XOXO,
      the poster boy of common sense

    • wow what a convoluted mess!


      the pebble effect!

    • i think that i have made myself very clear.

      i think that i have been consistent.

      i'm sorry that you do not understand that, follow it, or have a different take on the matter.

    • >>first off pebs, no one has spoken for me<<

      where did i say he was speaking FOR you? all i did was comment that he shouldn't be trying to read your mind. you sure has hell didn't say a thing about apache helicopters, did you?

      >>secondly, i have not backed off any statement or modified any position. our exchange and the exchange i am having with dg are two separate issues.<<

      oh really??? allow me to show the exact "paper trail" of how the discussion went.

      in your msg #11310, you made this statement in reply to my #11286:

      >>i do, however, have a sense for what may be causing the deaths of innocents in IRAQ --- coalition forces!<<

      that's the msg that dg followed up on and he repeated your comment in his msg #11314 and his reponse to your msg was:

      >> If all foreign forces pulled out of Iraq, would ALL the killing stop? <<

      in your reply to him you came back and said:

      >>well, i guess i'd phrase the question another way...<<

      so go ahead and try to tell us again that you didn't back off any statement.

      here's the entire thread:

      http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=1602339810&tid=cmcsa
      &sid=1602339810&mid=11286&thr=11286&cur=11286&dir=d


      that thread shows my first msg, your response to me, dg's response to you and (finally) your response to him where you "backed off" your original statement.

    • they DONT want to accept the truth..they have been bribed by the bush Capital Gains tax cuts...I dont think they give a damn about the real issues as long as they get that Dividend tax cut!! at least that is the only reason i can see why semi-knowledgeable people like pebbs refuse to see the reality. Debate48 is just plain retarded on most issues (see his alter ego jbass123 with his Anti-Comcast screed)so I dont expect much at all from him.


      Kerry in a Landslide!


      Tom Delay behind bars!


      its gonna happen!

    • View More Messages
 
CMCSA
57.04+0.18(+0.32%)Nov 28 1:00 PMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.