% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

BP p.l.c. Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • debbie08730 debbie08730 May 3, 2010 9:55 PM Flag

    BP Chose Not To Install Deep-Water Cutoff Valve To Safe Costs

    you are such an idiot, stop spreading false information you moron.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Read it for yourself, to the right and below the Obama video. The truth hurts but it's better to face it now before the rest of the story comes out.

      • 2 Replies to oil_man0319
      • You are right oil man. I find a strange belief in BP from the longs that is blinding them from basic reading. BP is great, they scream, as they stick there head in the sand.

      • anyone still believes we must drill, baby, drill offshore -- aside from Bill Kristol, that is, who wants to sink wells even closer to precious coastal wetlands -- then perhaps it is time to consider again the potential benefits of nationalization. After all, there is one country that has established an unrivaled record for environmental safety while exploiting its offshore petroleum reserves. That would be Norway, which created the company now known as Statoil Hydro as a fully state-owned entity and still controls nearly two-thirds of the company's "privatized" shares.

        The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Statoil rigs in the North Sea are required by law to maintain special "acoustic switches" that shut down operations completely (and remotely) in case of a blowout or explosion. The US Mines and Minerals Service, under the industry-friendly Bush administration, decided that rigs operating in American waters need not install those switches because they are "very costly." At $500,000 per switch, they now look like an enormous bargain, of course.

        What makes Norway so different from the United States -- and much more likely to install the most protective energy technology -- is that the Norwegian state can impose public values on oil producers without fighting off lobbyists and crooked politicians, because it owns and controls the resources. Rather than Halliburton-style corporate management controlling the government and blocking environmental improvement, Norway's system works the other way around. It isn't perfect, as any Nordic environmentalist will ardently explain, but the results are considerably better than ours.

30.46-0.15(-0.49%)Feb 5 4:01 PMEST