Wed, Apr 16, 2014, 11:31 AM EDT - U.S. Markets close in 4 hrs 29 mins

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Juniper Networks, Inc. Message Board

  • rmarshceint rmarshceint Mar 31, 2004 1:15 PM Flag

    Thankyou for ALL Shorts here today...

    Wheeeeew !! I thought we might be getting a little too positive here on this Board in the last week or so.

    But thanks to the shorties like oelhdm, atradinggod2, fkmm, foulmouth and a slew of others I know I am on the right side being Long.

    Just way too much pessimism and this is perfect for me as I am a "romantic" contrarian. It lets me know that we are still in the beginning stages of a thriving Bull Market.

    It is an essential ingredient to us Longs and the Market in general , signaling that we are on the right track.

    So Keep it up guys. You are doing beautiful. As soon as you stop I will start growling like a bear :)

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • I starting to think you really can't comprehend reading the posts.
      That's no joke in society and I'm sorry if you really can't.

      your question--
      "OK, REAL or whatever the heck your name is, how is the above statement deceitful ???
      And where in the above DO I MENTION ABOUT SCHAEFFERS SENTIMENT ON JNPR"

      answer from your own words--
      "It means strong sentiment for LOngs"

      Are you now willing to admit Schaeffers take is that Wall Street views JNPR as bullish just like I stated many times? Therefore from the contrarian view "it MEANS strong sentiment"(as you put it) for shorts.
      You're currently supporting the "Strong Buy" sentiment.

      REAL

    • "Your post about Schaeffer--
      Bernie Schaeffer is a contrarian and perhaps one of the most successful traders of our time and he focuses on an equation which calculates put/call ratio. It measures current sentiment amongst investors. And the more he sees pessimism in this calculation the more he realizes that the tide will soon change and he takes a Long Position. And vice versa with seeing a high ratio in this equation. It means strong sentiment for LOngs. And as a result a short positon should be taken. "

      OK, REAL or whatever the heck your name is, how is the above statement deceitful ???
      And where in the above DO I MENTION ABOUT SCHAEFFERS SENTIMENT ON JNPR
      .

      Show me REAL. I want hard cold facts just like you always say. Where do I SAY SCHAEFFERS SENTIMENT TOWARDS JNPR IN THE ABOVE STATEMENT ?? WHERE DUDE ??

      And also remember to address how is it deceitful ??

      Answer these qestion and these questions only !!!
      Ha, just admit your constant errors and name calling and move on. Everyone makes mistakes REAL.

    • Because I can't stand deceitful people like you I'll break it down for you

      Your post about Schaeffer--
      Bernie Schaeffer is a contrarian and perhaps one of the most successful traders of our time and he focuses on an equation which calculates put/call ratio. It measures current sentiment amongst investors. And the more he sees pessimism in this calculation the more he realizes that the tide will soon change and he takes a Long Position. And vice versa with seeing a high ratio in this equation. It means strong sentiment for LOngs. And as a result a short positon should be taken.
      http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=20494235&tid=jnpr&si
      d=20494235&mid=320766


      Schaeffer made no such comments.
      Scheaffers comments on JNPR are EXACT OPPOSITE. You can see here--(actual statements from Schaeffer himself)

      http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=20494235&tid=jnpr&si
      d=20494235&mid=320814


      REAL

    • "You will not elaborate because you obviously can't and thefore proved your deceit."

      Thats laughable and illogical. That makes a lot of sense!! LOL UHMM.... if someone refuses to reply to insults they are being deceitful.

      Wow, I hope you are not married REAL !! LOL

      I am still waiting for CONCRETE evidence that I was being deceitful.

    • You're real quick to once again openmout and insert foot.

      I replired to you already.
      Here's the link Mr FRAUD--

      http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=20494235&tid=jnpr&si
      d=20494235&mid=320859


      REAL

    • Please I am waiting for concrete verifiable statements that I was being deceitful. I am waiting REAL....

      Where is the evidence that I was deceitful.

      I will be waiting for your answer

    • My question--
      "2.Do you have anything more current from Schaeffer to supposrt your obvious deceitful post? If you don't than his last comments are current."

      your answer--
      "2.First of all this is a ridicolous question and I will not elaborate because none of my opinions are deceitful."

      Oh I see, you post your "opinion" and decide to FALSLY use Schaeffers name. You were trying to give the perception that this was Schaeffer take on JNPR and it clearly wasn't.

      You will not elaborate because you obviously can't and thefore proved your deceit.

      you state--
      "I want you with statements and facts show where I have been deliberately deceitful concerning this issue"

      I've already pasted Schaeffer's sentiment take on JNPR.
      DONE
      you state-
      "I want to see hard cold facts where you can identify me being deceitful"

      AGAIN you don't read the posts.

      It has been posted numerous times.

      You have now just admitted you a FRAUD by your answer to question #2

      Good Job!!

      REAL

    • you state--
      "Its amazing that your whole point concerning this issue is based upon an untrue statement and something that is totally moot."


      Untrue on your part--
      You stated Schaeffer sentiment research as bearish.

      I stated Scheaffers research as bullish with his news article to back it up.

      Where's your supporting article from Schaeffer?

      FRAUD!!

      REAL

    • 1.If timing is critical to you and you follow Schaeffers comments cloesly, why didn't you sell or make a post about his comments the day Schaffers news came out?

      2.Do you have anything more current from Schaeffer to supposrt your obvious deceitful post? If you don't than his last comments are current.

      1.Who says I didn't ?? And frankly I usually do not make that info privy to this Board.
      I make comments about ALL types of info. from ALL types of different sources. I have a network of friends and associates outside this Board that I have ongoing discussions about stock market. This Board takes very little of my time as far as researching and brainstorming stocks. I do it with other people in my life. So it is obvious that you and others here will never see or hear all of my vast views on investing and stock market. Thank goodness, right ????

      2.First of all this is a ridicolous question and I will not elaborate because none of my opinions are deceitful.


      Question for you, REAL. I want you with statements and facts show where I have been deliberately deceitful concerning this issue. I will be patiently awaiting. I want to see hard cold facts where you can identify me being deceitful.

    • Get over yourself already.

      There was no false statements on my part.
      The date of Schaeffer's news was for all to see and you admitingly didn't even read the post.

      Try posting something more "current" from Schaeffer.

      You're trying to avoid the real questions by talking about he date.

      This exercise got started when YOU POSTED FALSE STATEMETNS ABOUT BERNIE SCHAEFFER SENTIMENT OF JNPR.

      Apparently you can post all the BS and still can't answer the questions or substantiate your deceitful lies today.

      AGAIN--

      Two questions for you--

      Both of which I asked already and you still haven't answered.

      1)If timing is critical to you and you follow Schaeffers comments cloesly, why didn't you sell or make a post about his comments the day Schaffers news came out?

      2)Do you have anything more current from Schaeffer to supposrt your obvious deceitful post? If you don't than his last comments are current.

      This isn't about being current but it's about you posting deceitful information and you can't back it up.

      REAL

    • View More Messages
 
JNPR
25.09+0.200(+0.80%)11:30 AMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.