jmw, I am basing my post on reading VHC's responses to the ACPs. They are incredible and clearly point out the Examiner made some grave errors in his recent office action. It appears this will bode very well for VHC. Having to make minimal amendments on this broad of a reexam request is as close to string music that you can hope for.
Terp, this is Victor. If you do not know how to read, get someone you trust to read those responses to you. Apparently, the examiner made multiple errors and these mistakes can cascade to many of the other pending reexams. This does not look good for Apple, losing another potential spot of leverage.