The motion response to quash the subpoena is made with such vehemence as to strongly suggest that there is information that would be highly embarrassing to someone.
The motion to quash is most interesting as if there were nothing to hide such an energetic and spirited reply would be in no way warranted.
One easy point needs to be answered. A hedge fund is not the normal vehicle to request a re-exam at the patent office, so why is this fund requesting the re-exam.
The timing and the vehicle remain so suspicious that a response is warranted. Such an almost desperate response further arouses suspicions.