Fri, Nov 28, 2014, 6:11 AM EST - U.S. Markets open in 3 hrs 19 mins


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Emmis Communications Corp. Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • pjv2xyw9dww4b5 pjv2xyw9dww4b5 Mar 22, 2012 4:34 AM Flag

    preferred SOL


    "Emmis aspires to the highest ethical standards for our employees, officers and directors, and remains committed to the interests of our shareholders."

    Should the word "common" be inserted just before "shareholders?"

    This topic is deleted.
    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • The arrangement with the preferred is contractual. That contract allows for changes to a number of provisions of the preferred, if the company can "get the votes" of 2/3 of the preferred. 2/3 of the preferred shareholders sold back their stock at an average of about $16. The company was generous in allowing the preferred to maintain its $50 liquidation preference in its proxy. I believe it would have been within its perogatives to lower the preference to either one of 1) the weighted average price of the shares it bought in over the prior few months, or 2) the highest price ($21.50?) it paid for preferred shares in the prior few months.

      What if one of the conditions of buying back the 2/3 of the pfd stock would have been that Emmis asked the holders, up front, to vote to lower the liquidation preference to, say, $16. They could have had a Special Shareholder meeting of the preferreds, and got 2/3 to vote for that. However, no doubt, the preferred holders wanted liquidity QUICKLY, and Emmis had a window to strike with the Zell money, in order to create value for both the common, and preferred holders who wanted to sell. So, instead, they are changing the governing documents of the preferred afterwards. (That makes it seem a lot less "sinister," to those who are crying foul.)

      The bottom line is that they control 2/3 of the outstanding preferred, which in my world, makes the preferred a functionally "orphaned" security. As stated before, I'd like to see the parties come to terms, and those shares outstanding totally retired. I mean, Alden controlled roughly $60 million of preferred, at its theoretical liquidation preference, and they sold those back to the company at 25 cents on the dollar, roughly. They didn't leave $45 million on the table because they thought they could get the better of Emmis in a legal fight, apparently. They knew the preferred's market value, or had a notion in their mind, anyway...and they took it.

2.08-0.01(-0.48%)Nov 26 4:00 PMEST

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.