"I do love your made-up assertion that snow does not compact into ice over time though... amusing!"
Then you are ILLITERATE, that assertion was never made by me. Please explain how 350 feet of snow (your 7 ft./year x 50) compacts into 270 feet of ice. You can't (That damn Sorge's Law thing). Pulling numbers out of your ass doesn't make you 'educated'. Instead, you make a baseless allegation in the true Church-Monkey tradition.
Mr T pities YOU.
I'm aware of the lubrication of ice flow from melt getting underneath - it's a factor in motion, not mass variation. The water initiates from above, not below. You haven't explained how such an ice accumulation could have occured durring a period of "warmin"
If you bothered to educate yourself you would know that Greenland's main problem is the sluicing of water under the icecap. But why let facts get in the way of your insightless political views?
I do love your made-up assertion that snow does not compact into ice over time though... amusing!
What I want to know is how Al Gore became master of the universe? That must be one bad to the bone masters program.
Oh, I forgot. It's a conspiracy.
The fact that the concept of Al Gore manipulating the whole world like some sort of Muppets TV puppet-master is so ludicrous as to be beyond comprehension doesn't really matter, does it? That's how conspiracies work. The more complex and implausible, the better.
Try again chipper! nice hail-Mary on the "melting from below".
350 feet of snow (your 7 ft./yr x 50) does not compact into 270 +- feet of ice.
I'm still waiting for the explanation of how Atmospheric (climate) warming ties into glacial Ice "Melting from below"
You may have Greenland confused with Iceland, which does have a lot of near-surface geothermal activity. Lots of Ignoramuses do have that problem.
"Because it snows 7 feet a year there, you genius. A more germane measurement would be how far did the plane move downward in the ice substrait? As real scientists tell us, the Greenland icecap is melting from underneath."
Connection between atmospheric warming and 'melting from below'?
Delta between 'melting from below' and 'accumulation from above'?
How does the 350 (7x50) feet of aggregate snowfall you translate into 250 +- feet of ICE? The density relationship doesn't come within a country mile of that. You wouldn't be pulling crap out of your ass would you?
Let us pray: "Or Father, who art Al Gore . . ."
Jeez, you really are stupid aren't you!
Did anyone say there hasn't been winter snow and summer melts in Greenland in the last 70 years?
What is really ludicrous is the way you fools convince yourselves that the scientists' arguments are based on a 'split second of geological time'. You genuinely believe that you appreciate the complexity better than them!
That is very funny - but also very sad.