LOL you provide a strawman argument when I point out that a central tenant of your beloved theory has been proved wrong time and time again. Well played. "Most toys and money?" Maybe you haven't heard of Security Analysis and The General Theory of Employment, Money and Interest. Highly recommend both, I'm sure you'll pick up a thing or two in them as well. Or you can continue to provide non sequiturs on Congress, the NYT business model, and other inane observations.
Once they restart their other nuclear reactor in a few months and it shoots back up to book value (BV is $11, was at $33 before the accident with 3% dividend, and almost $4 per share in FCF), I'll be crying all the way to the bank.
Do you not understand the meaning of the term "limited liability?" Do you not understand that in a country with ZERO natural resources, they are entirely dependent on nuclear energy? "International prosecution?" You do realize that TEPCO doesn't have any foreign assets, so there's no way for any "international prosecutor" to reach them, correct? You're talking out of your #$%$