You know it stinks when the authorities instantly proclaim there was no indication of foul play. It's the Newman defense!
"When asked whether it had carried out tests for explosives on 911, NIST said it had not. When a reporter asked NIST spokesman Michael Newman why not, he replied: “Because there was no evidence of that.”
When the reporter asked the obvious follow-up question, “How can you know there’s no evidence if you don’t look for it first?”Newman replied: “If you’re looking for something that isn’t there, you’re wasting your time . . . and the taxpayers’ money.”
Sure....there wasn't any foul play. An engine for the car only flew 60 meters at a right angle from the direction of the car...Can you say "Arkincide?"