On Msft April 7, 1999:
potential scenario of the dynamics of Kosovo and NATO's
excessive attacks including the entire Serbia changes and
quickens the end result. Instead of a damped oscillitary
affect of NATO's involvement, the end result has already
been predicted and the drive to that goal has
accelerated causing an elimination of part of the oscillatory
forces. The drive to displace the Albanians has been
accelerated to a one sweep attempt. The scenario has the end
result of dealing with one hundred thousand or so
refugees. It was correct because there will be that many
that will not go back to Kosovo no matter how many
assurances from NATO or any other protection organization.
The US military did not want to get involved in the
ground war and they are right with thier position
because of the terrain and "moral" objective associated
with a "win". In addition, it may be good for the
democrats to just get most of the dominate Kosovo trend
over with in short order so that it significantly
diminishes it's affect on the next presidential election.
The Russian's wanted to see a partial failure of NATO
and would expend significant resource to see that to
protect the paranoid soviet element in the Russian
defense. The drug-runner element wants stability in the
European theatre because of the cash element and
geo-political stance so the war should not spread to the
macedonia-greek borders. All taken into account, today's
situation is in the realm of reason but there is a couple
hundred thousand extra refugees.
Opposite, an unauthorized version of Blane Laubis's
Some of the information you may be looking for
may be found in the GLX report to stock holders wich
was recently sent out along with proxies.
don't see why the share value lost 10+ points in the
past week and 1/2. Any thoughts on that?
In 1998 Glaxo Wellcome's sales increased 4%, at
constant exchange rates, to (million pounds sterling)
7,983. This was considered extraordinary in light of the
loss of patent coverage on their 2 largest products.
Sales excluding Zantac increased 13%. Zantac is now
only 9% of total sales. Sales excluding Zantac and
Zovirax increased 17%. Zovirax is now only 5% of total
sales. Retrovir (AZT or zidovudine) single active
formulations accounted for less than 2% of 1998 sales.
Sales (million pounds sterling) by therapeutic
Respiratory, 2193, +24%
(excluding Zovirax +15%)
Anti-bacterial, 836, +2%
GI, 761, -42%
Cardiovascular, 260, +17%
Dermatology, 243, +9%
All others, 535, +11%
anti-viral therapies include: Zovirax, Valtrex, Combivir,
Epivir, Retrovir, Ziagen, Wellferon, Lamivudine, and
(soon to come) Agenerase.
HIV sales (million
pounds sterling) were:
Combivir, 267, new
Retrovir, 150, -46%
779 (I notice this is off by 3), +10%
sales (million pounds sterling) were:
Zovirax, 403, -27%
total portfolio, 536, -15%.
I found this information on the Glaxo Wellcome
website and the Yahoo financial website. I do not have a
good idea where to look for patient/prescription
numbers. Hope this helps.
this dialogue of ours has been lots-o-fun but
it's really not fair to everyone else to continue.
Besides, you're startin' to scare me a little. I'm not a
doctor, but you're obviously more than a tad paranoid.
(I'm guessing there are also feelings of sexual
inadequacy as well) You really should seek some help.
Really, all kidding aside, I'm serious about that. Good
See , that's exactly what I mean : you know
nothing about GLX or their products , cause you can't
answer a simple question !!!
Oh , I've seen people
like you !!
They think they know it all !
when they are asked to answer a question :
what , they don't know the answer and they start using
words like frickin' , beggin' , fuckin'
loser now ?
From 8 "words" down to 4 !!
See , that's what
I mean !
Who's the loser now ?
I'm not in the
shorting business , but if there are more gamblers like
you who are buying GLX , then it might be wise to
overlook my decision of not shorting GLX .
you know not even shit , unless you can show me
some evidence of your knowledge .
Are you an investor ?
Probably not !
I'm trying to find some information .
of making yourself look stupid , you too should
to find information like this , how else can you
performance of GLX ?
Who's the loser
Show me some evidence you know something
about this company and
its products .