Sun, Jul 13, 2014, 10:37 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Impac Mortgage Holdings Inc. Message Board

  • tonyzhou7509 tonyzhou7509 Nov 16, 2012 5:56 PM Flag

    Non-recourse is not garuanteed

    Everyone should read the 10-K carefully.

    Representations and warranties made by us in our loan sales and securitizations may subject us to liability.

    In connection with our loan sales to third parties and our prior securitizations, we transferred mortgages acquired and originated by us to the third parties or into a trust in exchange for cash and, in the case of a securitized mortgage, residual certificates issued by the trust. The trustee, purchaser, bondholder, or other entities involved in the issuance of the securities (which may include bond insurers) may have recourse to us with respect to the breach of the representations, and warranties made by us at the time such mortgages are transferred or when the securities are sold. Those representations and warranties may include, but are not limited to, issues such as the validity of the lien, the absence of liens or delinquent taxes, the validity of the appraisal obtained in conjunction with the loan, the truthfulness of information used in the loan approval process, the loans compliance with all local, state and federal laws, the delivery of all documents required to perfect title to the lien, the loan meeting all underwriting criteria and the selection process used to include the loans in any particular transaction. Also, we previously engaged in bulk whole loan sales pursuant to agreements that generally provide for recourse by the purchaser against us in the event of a breach of one of our representations or warranties, any fraud or misrepresentation during the mortgage origination process, or upon early default on such mortgage. We attempted to limit the potential remedies of such purchasers to the potential remedies we received from those from whom we acquired or originated the mortgages. However, in some cases, the remedies available to a purchaser of mortgages from us may be broader or extend longer than those available to us against others whom have sold mortgage loans to us and should a purchaser enforce its remedies against us, we are not always able to enforce whatever remedies we have against others. Furthermore, if we discover, prior to the sale or transfer of a loan, that there is any fraud or misrepresentation with respect to the mortgage and the originator fails to repurchase the mortgage, then we may not be able to sell the mortgage or we may have to sell the mortgage at a discount.

    In other words, even if securitization trusts is non-recourse, there are exceptions, especially when the house market is not good. Many investors will sue the company. That's why the company paid $6.1M to settle. As of September 30, 2012, securitized mortgage collateral had an unpaid principal balance of $8.7 billion, compared to an estimated fair value of $5.7 billion. The company admit $3B loss and it may have much more. Now the question is how many more litigation will follow? Nobody knows. Maybe only a faction of people are considering sue the company since people know the company has no assets and so save money to litigation cost.

    Now read the following text also in 10-K carefully.

    There is recent litigation in the mortgage industry related to securitizations against issuers, sellers, originators, underwriters and other.

    As defaults, delinquencies, foreclosures, and losses in the real estate market continue, there have been recent lawsuits by various investors, insurers, underwriters and others against various participants in securitizations, such as sponsors, depositors, underwriters, and loan sellers. Some lawsuits have alleged that the mortgage loans had origination defects, that there were misrepresentations made about the mortgage loans and the parties failed to properly disclose the quality of the mortgage loans or repurchase defective loans or that there were other misrepresentations, lack of representations, or errors in securitization documents. There have been other claims contending errors or misrepresentations in the securitization documents or process itself. Historically, we both securitized and sold mortgage loans to third parties that may have been deposited or included in pools for securitizations. We have discovered discrepancies in our securitization documents and are working with the parties involved, including bondholders, on the issue. The Company has also received notices of claims for indemnification relating to mortgage backed securities bonds issued, originated or sold by the Company from Countrywide and Merrill Lynch. The claims seek indemnification from claims asserted against Countrywide and Merrill Lynch in specified legal actions entitled American International Group Inc. v. Bank of America Corp., et al Case No. 1:11-cv-06212 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston v. Ally Financial, Inc., et al Case No. 11-cv-10952 in the Superior Court Department of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The notices each seek indemnification for all losses, liabilities, damages and legal fees and costs incurred in those actions. In connection with these potential claims, we may become subject to litigation related to the securitizations. As a result, we may incur significant legal and other expenses in defending against claims and litigation and we may be required to pay settlement costs, damages, penalties or other charges which could adversely affect our financial results.

    On February 19, 2012, the Company entered into a tolling agreement which tolls the further running of the statute of limitations for any claims which the other party may hold. The other party purports to be a bondholder of some of our securities and for other securities for which we deposited loans. We do not know the nature of such claims as of this date.

    What is the impact of the litigations? Read the following:

    We may become, and in some cases are a defendant in purported class action lawsuits and may not prevail in these matters.

    Class action lawsuits and regulatory actions alleging improper marketing practices, abusive loan terms and fees, disclosure violations, improper yield spread premiums and other matters are risks faced by all mortgage originators. We are a defendant in purported class actions pending in different states and could be named in other matters. Some of the class actions allege generally that the loan originator (whether or not Impac) improperly charged fees in violation of various state lending or consumer protection laws in connection with mortgages that we acquired while others allege that our lending practice was a statutory violation, an unlawful business practice, an unfair business practice or a breach of a contract. They generally seek unspecified compensatory damages, punitive damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, costs and expenses and rescission of the mortgages, as well as a return of any improperly collected fees. We may incur defense costs and other expenses in connection with the class action lawsuits, and we cannot assure you that the ultimate outcome of these or other actions will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. In addition to the expense and burden incurred in defending this litigation and any damages that we may suffer, our management's efforts and attention may be diverted from the ordinary business operations in order to address these claims. If the final resolution of this litigation is unfavorable to us, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows might be materially adversely affected. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the actions and intend to defend against them vigorously; however, an adverse judgment in any of these matters could have a material adverse effect on us.

    Especially read the last sentence " an adverse judgment in any of these matters could have a material adverse effect on us." Note the word is "any", not the "most" or "some".

    Now read the bottom line from 10-K:

    If we are forced to liquidate, we may have few unpledged assets for distribution to unsecured creditors or equity holders.

    In the event we are forced to liquidate, the majority of our assets are either collateral for specific borrowings or pledged as collateral for secured liabilities. We may have few remaining assets available for unsecured creditors and equity holders.

    Sentiment: Strong Sell

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
5.01-0.01(-0.20%)Jul 11 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.
Turtle Beach Corporation
NasdaqGMFri, Jul 11, 2014 4:00 PM EDT
Potbelly Corporation
NasdaqGSFri, Jul 11, 2014 4:00 PM EDT