Suppose some who claims to be a big expert on correlation "coefficients" is asked for the answer to just about the most simple question in that field. But instead of answering and humiliating the person making fun of him, he says "I will not answer because you could not understand it". What is the correlation with him not really knowing the answer? What is the correlation for him being too stupid to realize how lame his rodent trick is? What is the correlation with everyone knowing what is gioing on.
I didn't attend junior high school. I went from 8th grade to high school then BS, MS and PhD.
I had one statistics class as an undergrad and two more while in graduate school.
Give me the year you got your PhD, and what was your dissertation on.
What statistical program did you use for your dissertation? If it was a qualitative study, which method did you use? Who's philosophy of science did you choose in making your choice regarding which kind of dissertation you used.
This drooler is TeeJerk..... and he cannot answer ANY of the questions.
"I didn't attend junior high school. I went from 8th grade to high school then BS, MS and PhD.
I had one statistics class as an undergrad and two more while in graduate school"
Really, what did you get your PhD in?
"Before I calculate the answer to your equation, you comment on the shoe size example"
I already commented Dr. Typist. In the case you gave, correlation did not imply causation. But finding a single example of correlation not implying causation does not prove your claim that correlation NEVER implies casusation. How many times do I have to explain that to you?