Sat, Dec 20, 2014, 12:31 AM EST - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

First Solar, Inc. Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • patkc69 patkc69 Apr 10, 2012 10:14 PM Flag

    anyone thinks I'm playing only chart, is totally wrong.

    Yes, solar panel costs have gone down making it more affordable to people, and companies have figured out to make profit with diminishing solar panel cost.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Solar does not replace nukes because nukes are base load, 24 hours. Solar competes with natural gas peaking units. Peaking units are something like $0.18/kwh and solar is nearly 1/2 as much.

      Nukes might cost $4/Watt, but they recoup installation costs 4 times faster than solar because they run 24 hours instead of an average 6 peak hours/day. In today's world of scarce capital, $2/Wpeak BOS solar is not cheaper than $4/W nukes because in terms of kWh per day, you only have to spend half as much on nukes because they give 4 times more per day. This is American thinking. In China where the long run is important and game with money are not so prevalent, solar is now cheaper than nukes under all scenarios.

 
FSLR
45.03-0.18(-0.40%)Dec 19 4:00 PMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.