% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

CEL-SCI Corporation Message Board

  • yankeesnyc27 yankeesnyc27 Jul 30, 2013 4:02 AM Flag

    would you invest in this??

    "Under a separate pathway known as "accelerated approval" drugs may be approved based on a so-called surrogate endpoint - a measure, such as TUMOR SHRINKAGE - that might reasonably be expected to CONFER A CLINICAL BENEFIT SUCH AS IMPROVED SURVIVAL"

    LINK to complete article: The article is from REUTERS , NOT Cel-Sci .

    The bashers say Cel-Sci is going to ZERO, but then they say a lot of things and all of it is negative.

    Consider the following: If Cel-Sci went to zero who would lose the most $ ??

    Large investors have OVER $55 Million riding on the success of CVM.

    Add to that and additional $9 Million worth of shares as a part (75% ) of the Byron settlement , not to mention at least another $25 M for warrants.
    That adds up to at least $89 Million , PLUS the cost of shares they hold.

    My ( and your ) potential loss pales in comparison with their loss.

    It's their money that pays Geerts salary , the P3 , and in plain English, EVERYTHING else!

    Does anyone really think the bashers want to see Cel-Sci at $0??

    They have FAR more money at risk than ALL the share holders COMBINED ( 309M X .1861 = $57.5 M VS. $89M) . Add to their investment the cost of the shares they hold. 150 Million (?) @ .1861 = $27.9 M.

    I can take the loss , can they ???

    "THEY" are my insurance policy. "They" are a condom providing protection. :)

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
0.458-0.002(-0.50%)Jun 29 4:00 PMEDT