Sun, Dec 28, 2014, 5:18 AM EST - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

SCO GRP INC (THE) Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • inymical inymical Jun 19, 2005 12:11 AM Flag

    PJ's full understanding

    I know your question concerns whether "irreplaceable code" could exist, but still think a patent on the overall function performed is the only way to keep it from being replaced, all else being equal.

    Even if the replacement was identical code, it could be a legitimate "new work". I did a controller once that had to keep a bunch (128) of outputs updated based on various flags, counters, etc, in a 1 ms interrupt routine. Straightforward code did not begin to fit into the number of cycles available. After a day or two of sheer panic, I wrote it all out as boolean logic and used logic minimization on that (a plan B involving FPGA's was in the back of my mind). The trusty Karnaugh map cranked out a much much smaller yet equivalent bit of ( completely indecipherable) logic that just barely fit into the cycles a 8051 can provide.
    (The 8051 is an 8-bit cpu, then maybe 0.7 MIPS) I had some fun with the comments.

    If a "black box" spec was written for that system, I would expect the exact same core sequence of code would result, just because only the truly minimum solution would fit. It would be clean code, independantly copyrightable, but a stupid patent on that particular trick would force a quicker CPU to be used.

    You have an interesting question, and I look forward to reading what the saner adult denizens will have to say about it :)

 
SCOXQ
0.020.00(0.00%)May 23 10:22 AMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.