Aspen Exploration Corp. ( now called Enservco Corp. ) used to have a working interest in 33 oil and gas wells located in the Williston Basin in Roosevelt Co. Montana. Does this sound familiar? ( from an Aspen Exploration Corp. SEC filing ):
----------------------------------------
----- "In February 2007, we ( Aspen ) purchased from Nautilus Poplar, LLC, a non-operating working interest in certain oil producing assets encompassing 22,600 acres in the East Poplar Unit and the Northwest Poplar Field in Roosevelt County, Montana located in the Williston Basin. These properties contain a total of 33 producing oil wells, and 7 salt-water disposal wells. Current production is 230 gross BOPD from the Charles “B” reservoir. Our interest in revenues from the Poplar Field will remain at 12.5% of the total interest acquired by Nautilus (about a 10% net revenue interest based on an average 80% NRI) until Aspen receives a return of 110% of its investment. Thereafter, Aspen’s interest will be reduced to 10% of that acquired by Nautilus (approximately an 8.0% net revenue interest to Aspen). The crude oil is 40o API sweet and is readily marketed at the lease boundary. All produced water is disposed within the Unit boundary.
We believe that the acquisition has provided us with diversification into long-lived oil reserves. There is also upside reserve potential via increased water disposal capacity, re-activation of old wells, water shut off techniques, behind-pipe potential in the Charles A, B, & C, and drilling potential in the Mission Canyon and Nisku. This acquisition also provides ownership in 3-D seismic data over 22,600 acres. We do not expect to realize any material revenue from this acquisition for the first two years.
Aspen will pay 12.5% of the costs for a 10% working interest in the project. During the first year, Aspen will also receive 12.5% of the net revenues (after deduction for royalties, taxes, operating expenses, etc.) until 110% payout, at which time Aspen’s working interest reverts to 10%. After the first year, even if 110% payout has not occurred, Aspen will only pay 10% of the costs and receive 12.5% of the net revenues until 110% payout. After 110% payout, Aspen will have a 10% working interest and receive 10% of the net revenues.
The initial cost to Aspen for its 12.5% before payout working interest (including its share of the acquisition costs) was approximately $1,450,000, which is approximately $1,075,000 after deduction of $375,000 (12.5% of the $3,000,000 loan proceeds obtained by Nautilus in connection with the purchase), with an additional $400,000 of anticipated capital expenditures during the first year. Aspen funded its participation in this project with a combination of bank debt of $600,000, cash on hand, and the sale of approximately 100,000 shares of UR Energy stock (which yielded about $330,000). Closing of this acquisition occurred on February 13, 2007..." -----
consider it bumped
Put it on top for the newbies.
Sentiment: Sell
Bump it again.... thanks
Thank you for the DD "refresh"
I don't exactly recall Xmas, but today was great!!!
bump to the top -- thanks
Did you have a Merry Christmas, roncor?
I guess that poster was embarrassed and withdrew his post.
If there is something pertinent why don't you just quote it so we don't need to guess what you are referring to?
You and carson should take a course in "edgar speak" and then try and graduate from high school!
conceptsnc. Sounds like Aspen was a pretty crummy outfit. Perfect buyer! LOL. You can check the old PR's Aspen put out while they did own the Poplar Field (( ENLIGHTENING!!!!!!!!! ))
Then Magellan bought! LOL
Except, look who is on Magellan BOD......
thank you!
WHAT A CROCK OF DECEPTIVE AND MISLEADING INFORMATION YOU ARE POSTING. What MPET owns is the whole banana. What Aspen sold was "Aspen held a 12.5% before payout working interest in the Poplar Field assets ... The Poplar Field assets were sold and conveyed to each of the Purchasers in the following approximate percentages: Hunter Energy 60%; and Nautilus Poplar 40%. The total purchase price for the Poplar Field assets was $1.2 million"
You also left this out of your not-so-very thorough or honest analysis, the main reason Aspen had to sell was (also from an SEC filing): "As announced in September 2008, our board of directors decided to investigate strategic alternatives for Aspen, including the possibility of selling our assets or considering another appropriate merger or acquisition transaction for several reasons, including: ... the likelihood that Aspen’s president will be unable to resume his former role and responsibilities and oversee Aspen’s day-to-day operations due to the effects of the stroke he suffered in January 2008"
somebody needs to do their homework...
Sentiment: Strong Sell
Why are you afraid?
carson, how are you spending the day on this the 25th anniversary of Black Monday 1987?