You raise issues and then abandon them when someone counters your concerns with data of his or her own. Fracking pollution? How about the development of clean fracking techniques? West Sussex objections to ruining the environment? What about the votes to the contrary, including the latest Council vote in favor of NG exploration? Park conservation issues? Why no responses to the approved efforts to maintain the pristine landscape and natural habitats while exploring for resources?
Face it, Collective, you are (all) a joke here. But I don't hold you completely to blame. I really think you were sent out ill-prepared by your handler. The lack of response when time and time again you comments are engaged and disproved tells me that even your puppet master is a novice. Save yourselves from further embarrassment and tell him to step aside as well. You (all) as a Collective are quite pathetic and found lacking time and time again.
Nero fiddled while Rome burned. You (all) diddle while Magellan's volatility makes profits ongoing. More's the pity. Pathetic, they name is Collective ...
AnyMouse ... what part of the math don't you understand? Seems clear to most of us ... Are you suggesting in this plea for help in understanding a financial statement that you are, as it honestly appears, math challenged?
Santos took over the Mereenie oil field in 2011 and long term gas contracts went to another Aussie company. Yes, production is down but the reasons have been clearly given time and again yet you and the other appendages, annony-moose, continue to deny them. I have no idea whether or not Magellan will begin to show better results but I do not live in the distant or recent past when posting to this board.