This is a follow-up article by AF based on an article which he took an informal poll of opinions on a number of stocks. Based on those who responded, these are the results. It is irresponsible journalism because he doesn't say in this article who the respondents are. But those who responded are anyone who chose to take a few seconds out of their day. No knowledge of the companies were a prerequisite to cast a vote. You could have been a 10 year old for all they knew. It held about as much validity as going to a bar in the Philippines and asking the people there to vote for who's going to win between Ohio State and Michigan in football.
I should have known - AF again. He runs a shorting ring. Gets all of his flying monkeys to "vote" against approval, shorts the stock, then publishes the findings. I don't know why this guy isn't in jail.
Read it a little more carefully. That was a survey completed by 110+ members of their website who voted yay or nay on FDA approval of a ton of drugs. These aren't experts. I'm 99% sure that the majority of them responded with guesses since the results for DCTH are highly unlikely imo.