Thu, Sep 18, 2014, 10:28 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc Message Board

  • techread techread May 12, 2014 10:24 AM Flag

    wow...

    Took a few minutes to read the latest over on IV. Really, a few astute posters call out DD on his latest round of "it's not what you think"...and once again the subject gets re-directed. I read every filing. Pay attention to what they don't say as much as what they do. Really, PM gave them to MG? Those are reportable plain and simple. PM can go over the blocker, as they did in 2012 and fully report. The blocker is designed to protect the common shareholder. The holes in the PM blocker are exactly why additional blockers were added to the Crede deal.. "If" PM didn't once again unload, the only other reason to convert and tuck them under the radar is a proxy. Take a look at the ongoing and very ugly proxy battle being waged by PM on ECTE. Really? MG is the PM designated BOD member yet he's no longer associated with them? Let's just call a spade a spade. DD is PM's mouthpiece plain and simple. Next up in the que for NAVB is a balance sheet restructure and that will likely give PM a huge new block of shares to wash-rinse. They latest conversions are the last stage of the rinse cycle. Next comes the repeat at the low SP. NAVB holders are stuck with this chronic dilution until the company is cash-flow positive and no longer needs them. MG bullied his way onto our BOD and don't think for a minute he doesn't represent PM first, everyone else last. If you're into TA plot the PM conversion dates on a momentum chart and you'll know exactly when to expect the next wave of sell pressure. All IMHO of course.
    BOL all.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Techread,

      People have shown suspicion that DD is MG himself. There is one more important post on the OT board:

      "In the meantime there are MUCH more important Navidea issues on which we need to focus, some of which I believe we're going to be hearing about shortly.

      DDbuyer "

      Here you go ... Now they are accepting that thee are issues? why the did not realize it when everyone pointed out? What value they have provided to the company? If we accept that Larson was the ONLY one culprit for the Crede debacle, who else reviewed this deal?Pykatt or Tulip became novice? come on, they knew what was happening but they did not give a second thought to the shareholders.

      DD is the mouthpiece of PM but unfortunately he is not able to give value to NAVB. Saving PM not NAVB....

    • lnsideoutsideupsidedown lnsideoutsideupsidedown May 12, 2014 11:06 AM Flag

      Techread, I don't post nor read hear much, but occasionally I see one of your posts and read it as you have decent analysis. However, I come to the realization that the facts do back up that PM has not sold. If you look at the last 13D that was filed, there was a subtle difference to previous filings. Previous filings had PM and PPVA funds showing shared voting power for the entire NAVB PP ownership. However, this time around PPVA has shared voting power for only 10M while PM has voting power for the remaining (series B equivalents), so the shares have been separated between these two entities in the 13D reporting. The 10M with PPVA are the same number of shares that calculated to what PM has lightened their portfolio with. Any It's subtle, but the 10K reporting specifically states PM and not PP or PPVA and if PM is no longer claiming those 10M shares, but leaving PPVA to claim the remaining, this accounts for the discrepancy while showing PP as a group is not selling. As now two separate entities, only PPM is at the 9.99% level and they subsequently converted 14M shares from preferred to get to the 9.995level, after already carving out the 10M to PPVA. As to the shares going to MG, I don't know, but it appears to me these shares had been specifically carved out from PM per PP last 13D filing, and the 13D filing to show this was back on 11/13/13.

      • 1 Reply to lnsideoutsideupsidedown
      • inside....they are required to report as one. same as their other holdings. Read the most recent ECTE filings as an example....Uri, Mark, etc. are all required to report collectively and beneficially. They "report" at the 9.99% level as that represents their potential max voting power w/o giving 60 days notice that they are waiving the blocker. In essence the shares cannot and never have been separated. Also refer to 2012 when they reported owning only 3M shares, yet exceeded the blocker due to having derivative positions. We have not seen 2 separate entities report yet because they don't exist as separate from a reporting standpoint. Owners over 5% have requirements as well. Directors have to report everything over 0%. That's my opinion and with that said respect yours as well. GLTY

    • I have said that a million times that until pm is out of converting / selling shares the stock will never move back to where it was.

 
NAVB
1.33+0.04(+3.10%)Sep 18 4:03 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.
Oracle Corporation
NYSEThu, Sep 18, 2014 4:04 PM EDT
Concur Technologies, Inc.
NasdaqGSThu, Sep 18, 2014 4:00 PM EDT
Rite Aid Corporation
NYSEThu, Sep 18, 2014 4:02 PM EDT