There are some very talented and credible Dr's on board
IMO the strongest addition to the advisory board is Gwen Wood...with both a legal and a scientific background. Nothing against having 2 long -tenured OB/GYN's on board, but you already have the younger Faro doing the work and the one who presents the data.
Warfield...that is without question and beyond any doubt. People just seemed to think I was being critical that the CEO chose 2 medical professionals from the same practice/specialty, with seemingly similar resumes' to be on the NNLX advisory panel/board. I just pointed out the potentially difficult situation BB could have put himself in if he chose 1 and not the other. Both have likely played major/equivalent roles in the planning & administration of the research work done at TMC to date.
<<<Dr. Wood’s practice focuses on preparation and prosecution of U.S. and foreign patent applications, patent searching, patentability and infringement/freedom-to-operate opinions, due diligence analyses and U.S. and foreign patent portfolio strategy and management>>>
The professional relationship between Bret and these two doctors could be such that if he appointed one & not the other, or vice versa...someone might have been offended. So why create tension with your important R & D customer? Simple solution. Appoint them both.