Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Bonanza Goldfield Corporation Message Board

  • wcoastguy2008 wcoastguy2008 Apr 15, 2012 12:35 PM Flag

    Does the C.E.O . Have to Return 17,000,000 Shares?

    The Company was informed that the Prior CEO/CFO, created a series of promissory notes, such form of notes being provided by a lawyer named John Thomas, Esq. These promissory notes and documentation provided a signed assignment of two promissory notes with Venture Capital, Inc. a group from Switzerland. Over time, including discussions with the prior CEO/CFO, new management was able to directly contact a representative of Venture Capital who claims that its signatures on the notes and the later conversions to equity were forged. The alleged improper assignment orchestrated the issuance of converted allegedly improperly transferred debt for the following numbers of shares:

    a)

    December 9, 2010: Tucker Financial Services, Inc. received 12,000,000 common shares alleged to be exempt from registration under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933 (although new management believes that such exemption was not available) for the conversion of $2,900.
    b)

    January 24, 2011; Tucker Financial Services, Inc. received 12,000,000 common shares alleged to be exempt from registration under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933 (although new management believes that such exemption was not available) for the conversion of $2,900.
    c)

    February 16, 2011: Stock Loan Solutions received 12,000,000 common shares alleged to be exempt from registration under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933 (although new management believes that such exemption was not available) for the conversion of $2,900.
    d)

    February 22, 2011: Nicolas Sprung of Tucker Financial Services Inc. received 12,000,000 common shares alleged to be exempt from registration under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933 (although new management believes that such exemption was not available) for the conversion of $2,900.
    e)

    April 18, 2011: Euroline Clearing Corporation received 7,000,000 common shares alleged to be exempt from registration under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933 (although new management believes that such exemption was not available) for the conversion of $2,900.
    f)

    April 18, 2011: Enavest International S.A., received 7,000.,000 common shares alleged to be exempt from registration under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933 (although new management believes that such exemption was not available) for the conversion of $2,900.
    g)

    April 18, 2011: Vanilla Sky, S.A. received 7,000,000 common shares alleged to be exempt from registration under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933 (although new management believes that such exemption was not available) for the conversion of $2,900.
    h)

    June 28, 2011: Scott Geisler received 17,000,000 common shares alleged to be exempt from registration under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933 (although Mr. Geisler had no knowledge of the documentation provided by John Thomas was false and this was transacted through a Broker Scottsdale Capital ) for the conversion of $2,900.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies