Thu, Sep 18, 2014, 4:03 AM EDT - U.S. Markets open in 5 hrs 27 mins

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

CombiMatrix Corporation Message Board

  • bitesr@ymail.com bitesr Jan 13, 2013 5:44 PM Flag

    Stick a Fork in It, The Company Business is Over

    At some point in time, the stock price and market cap is supposed to actually reflect the value of the underlying business. That is not the case at present as the stock price should be sub $1 and heading to zero. The misleading first press release about the meidcal study had nothing to do with the CBMX business or services (there are no products). The second misleading press release this month indicated that Q4 numbers will be in line with the first 9 months of 2012 and show that the revenue is reliant only on prenatal testing as the cancer testing business has gone away. And close to $6Mil was lost in the first 9 months of 2012, meaning that the only cash left to lose in 2013 is the $2.4Mil that cost the company and its shreholder, err bagholders, over 60% of its equity.

    But Wait! There's More!
    In addition to the insurance fraud lawsuit that will BK the company before the natural course BK in April, there's the fact that the only revenue business, prenatal testing with microarrays, is not outmoded and going away. Here's an article from Genomeweb (people who understand this business read Genomeweb) showing that the CBMX Edsell is going to die on the vine even if it raises more capital to stay in business beyond Q2 2013 and even further dilutes shareholders beyond the 3.4Mil shares outstanding.You'll note CBMX isn't even mentioned as a player in its own market as it is too irrelevant. ILMN will render this business moot. Remember the FDA can shut down CBMX at any time because CBMX never applied for FDA marketing approval of its services. Instead CBMX is not a real business but a pump and dump stock market scam and an ATM machine for shorters.

    NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – Massively parallel sequencing of cell-free DNA gathered from maternal blood samples can give researchers a view of fetal subchromosomal abnormalities that is equivalent to what would be obtained from a chromosomal microarray or metaphase karyotype, Verinata Health researchers reported today in the American Journal of Human Genetics.

    The researchers, led by Richard Rava, the chief scientific officer of Verinata, examined maternal blood samples taken from pregnant women carrying fetuses with known subchromosomal duplications, deletions, and other changes to determine the accuracy of massively parallel sequencing for noninvasive prenatal testing.

    Verinata offers Verifi, a prenatal blood test based on technology developed by Stephen Quake's lab at Stanford University that currently focuses on detecting trisomies and sex chromosome abnormalities. Earlier this week, Illumina announced that it plans to acquire Verinata for up to $450 million and that it will be submitting the Verifi test to the US Food and Drug Administration as an in vitro diagnostic test.

    In the AJHG study, the Verinata researchers showed that deep sequencing of cell-free fetal DNA from maternal blood may be a viable addition to, or replacement for, analysis of fetal samples using karyotyping or chromosomal microarrays. "Our study is the first to show that almost all the information that is available from an invasive procedure is also available noninvasively from a simple maternal blood draw," Verinata's Rava and the study's senior author said in a statement.

    While a number of sequencing-based tests — such as Verifi, Sequenom's MaterniT21, and Ariosa's Harmony — analyze maternal blood to detect whole-chromosomal aneuploidies, the Verinata team sought to show that the approach could be used to detect subchromosomal abnormalities as well.

    How well massively parallel sequencing can detect fetal chromosomal abnormalities from maternal blood depends on the percentage of fetal DNA found in maternal blood samples — the higher the fraction, the better the approach should work.

    Rava and his colleagues artificially combined fetal and maternal DNA at different fractions of fetal DNA — both 5 percent and 10 percent mixtures — to test how deep they'd have to sequence them to get a good look at the fetal DNA. Those samples, obtained from the Coriell Institute for Medical Research, represented a range of chromosomal abnormalities, from aneuploidies to mosaic sub-chromosomal copy-number changes.

    Additionally, the researchers turned to 11 blood plasma samples from the MELISSA trial, which examined aneuplodies and other chromosomal aberrations in high-risk pregnant women, to test the approach on clinical samples.

    Both sets of samples were tagged with 25-mer tags, with about a billion tags per sample, and sequenced with single-ended, 36-basepair reads on Illumina's HiSeq 2000 instrument. The reads were then mapped to the human reference and examined and classified for chromosomal abnormalities.

    "This study demonstrates that in nonmosaic cases, it is possible to obtain a fetal molecular karyotype that is equivalent to CMA by MPS of maternal plasma cfDNA," the researchers wrote. "In some cases the MPS results provided better resolution than a metaphase karyotype obtained from chorionic villi or amniocytes."

    Additionally, the investigators noted that their approach was able to identify where additional material found on chromosomes in two different samples may have originated from by detecting small deletions at likely breakpoints.

    However, the inability to provide results on clinical mosaic samples points out the approach's limitations: Certain genomic regions close to the telomeres or centromeres remain inaccessible.

    Despite the limitations, the researchers said that sequencing of cell-free fetal DNA from maternal blood to look for chromosomal abnormalities may be a stepping stone for introducing other prenatal diagnoses. Such an approach would likely also be safer as a blood draw eliminates the low, but possible, risk of miscarriage associated with amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling.

    "Although this work suggests an exciting future path toward routine noninvasive detection of the entire fetal genome, most clinicians are not yet ready to interpret the massive amounts of information that will come from the entire sequence," Rava and his colleagues wrote. "They are, however, already familiar with CMAs, so our work can potentially be translated to clinical care more expeditiously and eventually provide a rationale for whole-genome sequencing of the fetus."

    The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics updated its guidelines several years ago to recommend chromosomal microarrays as a first-tier diagnostic test for the postnatal evaluation of patients with developmental delay or intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders, or multiple congenital anomalies. However, ACMG's guidelines continue to state that arrays should only be used as an adjunctive test to karyotyping in a prenatal setting.

    The organization does not support the use of prenatal sequencing except for cases in which a fetus has "a likely genetic disorder in which specific genetic tests , including targeted sequencing tests, available for that phenotype have failed to arrive at a diagnosis," according to a policy statement issued last May.

    ACMG notes in the statement that prenatal diagnosis by genomic sequencing has "significant limitations." Namely, "the current technology does not support short turn-around times which are often expected in the prenatal setting. There are high false positive, false negative, and variants of unknown clinical significance rates. These can be expected to be significantly higher than seen when array CGH is used in prenatal diagnosis."

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Article makes a lot of good points....as do you. However, the new technology referenced does not appear to be a game-changer, nor is it a commercially viable at this point (or perhaps ever.)

      CBMX is high risk to be sure and I didn't think they would dilute until the 2H 2013. That said, their conference call next month and earnings will be very important. If they show enough growth to be profitable (which won't take much) and take future dilution off the table in that way, they can spike pretty high.

      Not sure what they have in the pipeline though. I would think peak sales for this kind of test for CBMX would be about $40,000,000 of the $600,000,000+ market which would be a ton of upside for them.

      We'll see I guess.

 
CBMX
1.47+0.01(+0.68%)Sep 17 3:59 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.