what are you talking about. everybody knows that nuclear energy is unattainable. That's why your electric hasn't gone down one bit. It is too damn expensive to maintain. But that doesn't matter we all make money if Washington is along with it.
Peter Pan you are right... so you should buy solar and wind stocks. You should see a good return in around 30 to 50 years when the cost comes down enough to not need taxpayer subsidy. The liberals will be quick to turn subsidy in taxation at that point because of all the rare earth materials and mining needed for construction. By then molten salt reactors will be utilizing nuclear waste for fuel as well. Not saying wind and solar is a bad thing, we will need a mix of energy which includes everything while in the transition decades toward a higher percent of renewables. Do tax payers heavily subsidize wind and solar in never never land?
peter8.75, please grow up. Take a bold step in admitting Solar stocks are going nowhere in last decade. German chancellor Angela Merkel faced tremendous criticism for abandoning nuclear power resources. The only clean power available at affordable expense is Nuclear power and that needs Uranium to sustain. So you have two options : 1. Buy Solar stocks and post your excitement on one of their boards, or 2. Buy Uranium stocks and post relevant appropriate posts on one of their boards and quit bashing them. If you choose any other option, it just makes you look stupid and you lose your credibility in further posts.