Great, a cold war-era president with a cold war-era cabinet... What do we get?
A cold war.
Pyongyang warned the danger of nuclear war on the Korean peninsula is growing in a New Year's editorial published in North Korea's three major newspapers.
The danger of a nuclear war is growing on the Korean peninsula as the days go by, owing to the U.S. moves to stifle the (North Korea)," the editorial said.
"All Koreans should stage a powerful struggle for peace against war in order to drive the U.S. troops out of South Korea, remove the very source of a nuclear war and defend the peace and security on the Korean peninsula."
The editorial contrasted with last year's message, making no mention of a need by the North for a nuclear deterrent, and called on the United States to end its hostile attitude toward North Korea, which U.S. President George Bush named to an "axis of evil" that also includes Iran and Iraq.
The United States and North Korea's neighbors are hoping North Korea will agree to restart talks on its nuclear activities in coming weeks, the Financial Times reported.
> SO ACCORDING TO DEMS, THE WEATHER REPORTER
> IS USUALY A LIAR.
Scott Ritter, the life long REPUBLICAN, the EX MARINE, the CHIEF WEAPONS INSPECTOR OF IRAQ, said in 2000 that Saddam Hussein didn't have any weapons of mass destruction capability. He did this during Clinton's presidency.
But for SOME REASON he then was called a Saddam Hussein SYMPATHIZER and then when that failed a PEDOPHILE by the Bush administration.
Gee whiz, and he was 100% completely correct.
Nothing fishy here!
> HE TAKES THE INFORMATION GIVEN TO HIM AND
> DECIDES TO REPORT SUNSHINE.
Actually, the weather reporter simply reads off of the forecast from the National Weather Service, which you can just call directly like I do, when I go hang gliding.
> BUT WHEN IT RAINS INSTEAD, THEN THE WEATHER
> REPORTER IS A LIAR ACCORDING TO DEM LOGIC.
Why is it you feel compelled to bring up an entirely false analogy?
Is it because it's blatantly obvious the adminstration lied?
Why did the US fail to convince the UN to give them a mandate to invade Iraq? Maybe it's because OTHER countries have spy technology too and didn't see anything the US (supposedly) did, in fact, the United States was reduced to making ARTIST RENDITIONS of "mobile weapons labs" at one point. It was hilarous. Why were there artist renditions? Because they NEVER EXISTED. It was a LIE.
> THAT PROVES DEMS HAVE REALLY F...ED BRAINS.
The Democrats as I recall didn't believe George Bush when he claimed that Hussein was a threat to the United States.
And the Democrats were right.
The Republican swallowed this bull
Draw your own conclusion about who has
> BUT WE ALREADY KNOW DEMS ARE LYING COWARDS
> DESCENDENTS OF BENNEDICT ARNOLD ANYWAY.
Ah, the familiar appeal to emotional hysterics, because facts don't support your irrational support for the man that has killed 1,200 US servicemen based on an utter lie and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians. Of course, killing Arabs is all fine and good for a Republican to do - because Republicans aren't the least bit racist (supposedly.)
But it's the Republican mantra that George Bush is a "moral man" - yet a Republican has the audicity to call the other side "stupid". It's quite a hoot.
Engh, American soldiers are just playthings anything, it doesn't matter if we went to war over a complete lie over the objections of the world and that the American public was lied to. At least Bush didn't get a
So according to dems, the weather reporter is usualy a liar.
he takes the information given to him and decides to report sunshine.
but when it rains instead, then the weather reporter is a liar according to dem logic.
that proves dems have really f...ed brains.
but we already know dems are lying cowards descendents of bennedict arnold anyway.
>> Any SANE person thinks that getting a blow
>> job and lying about it PALES...
> Change the subject...
The subject, dum
>> and lying about why we went to war.
> And lie.
Hey, who OUTSIDE of the administation was claiming there were weapons of mass destruction before congress or the UN?
It was the administration ALONE that was claiming before the UN and congress that Hussein posed a direct imminent threat to the United States.
Since there were no weapons of mass destuction, DUMB
Oh, I keep forgetting, you're Hawcreep, obviously, it's Clinton's responsibility. Everything is that is bad.
> Was Clinton "Commander in Chief" of the
> military. You think it is acceptable to
> allow behavior from the CIC to do what
> would land any petty officer in brig?
Any SANE person thinks that getting a blow job and lying about it PALES in comparison to bringing a country to WAR and lying about why we went to war.
But you're INsane, Hawcreep.
>> You're the *biggest*
>> I've ever seen Hawcreep.
> Coming from such a bona-fide nutcase I'll
> take that as a compliment.
You claimed that Clinton getting his willy waxed by Monica Lewinsky lead to 9/11 in Message 923573 and you're calling ME a "bona-fide nutcase"?
You're a total
Hey, where are all those weapons of mass destruction Bush and his cronies were talking about for the last 3 years? Oh, can't impeach him on MERELY killing 1,000 US Soldiers, they are just "little people" anyhow.
At least Bush doesn't flip flip, sure, he might be 100% wrong, but that won't change his direction! What leadership. It's awful when you you can see and you're being forced to be led by the blind.