Haw referenced an obscure journal he found by a quick google search to support his claim that medicine is significantly more difficult in the US because of ethnic diversity.
The tried and true right wing nutjob tactic know as the fallacy of composition. A small sliver of the total is confused for the total.
I said it was a highly technical article that i could not understand and Haw probably couldn't either.
His masterpiece reply.
"I understand what it conveys and what it conveys requires no logic."
There ya have it. That article published in 2006 is proof that medicine is significantly more difficult on average than the medicine for a homogeneous group.
Wow you would have though a broken arm, flu, infections, wounds, trauma injuries, cancer, could be reasonable treated in a diverse group before this 2006 publication. Who would have thunk it.
Now he will search again and find a article claiming a 0.2% increase in the prognosis of X disease if new technology could only isolate new medicines for all the ethnic groups and thus "prove" his point again.
It just may be that right wing nut jobs have a particular cognitive disorder where they simultaneously cannot tolerate contradictions and unconsciously fabricate loose hypothesis that fits their world view as quickly and possible so they can go back to being "Right"
<You *were* present.>
No, floundering moron, I am across country from him, idiot.
None apply, but feel free to keep making a fool of yourself with your English challenged arguments, ESL.
We would have you in the middle on a rotiserie.
Why can't you tell us which out of the 4 criteria VCSY meets? Will it embarrass you? I think it will. It will make your little simpleton's sham unravel? Sure it will. Tell us which one, hawcreek. The audience is waiting.
<Used to refer to the person or thing present, nearby, or just mentioned".>
And none of those conditions apply.
Thanks for chiming in with your nightly "I'm a knee-JERK moron and I can't stand Hawcreek always whipping my ass" comment.
Now stfu, and move along.
<Words twisted by your devious character have the meaning you want to push.>
What a bald-faced liar you are. I twisted nothing.
You tried to be a smart-ass, you just left out the "smart" part.
Words twisted by your devious character have the meaning you want to push. That's all. Keep it up. People see through your crap and they know what you're up to. You're very transparent and it's the honest people who can see people like you from miles away.
Oh I forgot how you like your word games. The reader can see that word play very easily also. It's the only way you know how to drive an argument into the ground. Have fun, hawcreek. People are going to write about you for a long long time. You're going to be the poster child for silly, intellectually blind dimwits.